Unfortunately there are also other bad people.

My ignorance is being displayed here, I only vaguely remembered the story as him running the ~42km and then dying from exhaustion.

Imagine his face when he finds out people are running more than twice the distance just for kicks.

Like, what part of Mullvad not being responsible for the donation in any way is it that people are not understanding? The company had no control or say over this dudes donation, so they can’t be responsible for it. Sure, don’t buy mullvad so you avoid indirectly giving the nutjob more money to support his fascist political views, that’s a totally valid response. But It doesn’t change that Mullvad is not, and never can be, responsible for his donation.

Yes I fully understand how he gets money from being part owner of the company, I never said that wasn’t the casr. But how he chooses to spend his private cash is not the fault of Mullvad the company.

I completely get wanting to boycott the company to avoid giving him money. But it makes no sense to blame the company for his private spending.

Yes of course he is. but once it leaves the company to pay him his share, Mullvad is not able to control of what that money is spent on whatsoever. Since he made a private decision outside the control or influence of the company, how couod Mullvad be accountable for it?

The guy made a donation with his own money. His donation is no more Mullvads than a donation you make privately is representative of the company you work for.

you can always rely on him

he would betray me at a drop of a hat if it suited his interests.

Those two statements seem mutually exclusive

I thought you were the captain?

Everyone doesn’t love Spain…many people just hate Argentina.

That would only result in everyone entering their own version of what they believe the data should be structured like, making it a completely mangled shitshow without a shred of consistent workflow across the company. As soon as the user has the ability to deviate from the standard data format they will do so, just because they personally want it differently. It’s an absolutely horrible idea.

Yeah i read Like 8-12 books per year, at best, it doesn’t make sense to automate any aspect of that.

Fair enough, it’s just that the whole point of these pod brewers is that they can make a cup of coffee from powered off state to finish in a literal minute so I hardly see the point. But “new gadget” is a reason I guess.

I’m very pro home automation, but what problem does this actually solve? Like, you still need to be at the machine to make the coffee (put a cup there, put in the pod in this case), so remote brewing doesn’t make sense.

I couldn’t care less that Spain won, I’m just happy Argentina didn’t win.

I just manually transfer books to my reader when I get them. I have them organized by genre on my reader (done manually). This is not an area where I see automation providing any significant benefit to bother setting up and maintaining an automated pipeline.

Not really, the specification of “the head” would refer to the head of the nail in the context of the idiom, because that’s the only thing in the idiom with a head so it’s the only head it can refer to.

If Nestlé had a security breach that compromised production they wouldn’t stop the production. They’d just silently keep making compromised product and sort of fix it on the fly.

This depiction is not what the idiom means though, when you take it literally.