At least write what the party says it is going to do
No, they should present what each party actually tries to do. No more lies.
At least write what the party says it is going to do
No, they should present what each party actually tries to do. No more lies.
It’s been time for like 10 years
Why do you feel that sexiness is an appropriate scale to be using here? There is more to women than their sex appeal.
I was like, why specify “one or more” and then make it optional? Isn’t that just .*?
Yes! Well said.
Literally required to do it by law of sanctions
DRY is usually helpful if you don’t use it in situations where you have like 2 semi-different things. If they’re actually the same and you have 3 or more then the level of abstraction is worth it almost always.
Unfortunately I’m still on windows, so [User]/Documents/Projects/*
Ah, didn’t know +? was lazy, thanks
Code that’s easy to extend generally encourages creating related code that’s easy to delete. These are very similar directives.
The capture group must be the same each time it repeats, so the number of characters stays the same. So X groups of Y characters = string of length X*Y. X and Y can be anything so any string length that can be made by multiplying two numbers-- which is every non-prime string length-- is matched. 0 and 1 are handled specially at the start.
Is there a reason to use (..+?)
instead of (.+)
?
Same!
Plasma, because I want things to Just Work™ and the customizability and modernity are neat. I like right click --> pin to top/bottom as well.
Why the fuck do they keep trying to do this??
I’m in favor of the niagra jim