Doh! Didn’t mean to link to a specific time in the video.
Let’s grow
Doh! Didn’t mean to link to a specific time in the video.
Definitely. The thing you might want to consider as well is what you are using it for. Is it professional? Not reliable enough. Is it to try to understand things a bit better? Well, it’s hard to say if it’s reliable enough, but it’s heavily biased just as any source might be, so you have to take that into account.
I don’t have the experience to tell you how to suss out its biases. Sometimes, you can push it in one direction or another with your wording. Or with follow-up questions. Hallucinations are a thing but not the only concern. Cherrypicking, lack of expertise, the bias of the company behind the llm, what data the llm was trained on, etc.
I have a hard time understanding what a good way to double-check your llm is. I think this is a skill we are currently learning, as we have been learning how to sus out the bias in a headline or an article based on its author, publication, platform, etc. But for llms, it feels fuzzier right now. For certain issues, it may be less reliable than others as well. Anyways, that’s my ramble on the issue. Wish I had a better answer, if only I could ask someone smarter than me.
Oh, here’s gpt4o’s take.
When considering the accuracy and biases of large language models (LLMs) like GPT, there are several key factors to keep in mind:
In summary, while LLMs can provide valuable assistance in generating text and answering queries, their accuracy is not guaranteed, and their outputs may reflect biases present in their training data. Users should use them as tools to aid in tasks, but not as infallible sources of truth. It is essential to apply critical thinking and, when necessary, consult additional reliable sources to verify information.
I had the same thought!
In the ocean? I like decent grandmas who want their car batteries properly d’esordio of.
Edit: disposed*
It’s rhe trillions of dollars in debt bit I’m skeptical that it really matters.
This popped up on my yt feed and I had no idea what a legit informative video it would be.
Curious who uses this for pro means. With FCP, Logic, Resolve on there now, who would choose an iPad for these?
Great way for a kid to start learning them, I imagine, but I would wager a guess that most pro peeps are using it for illustration and art.
Commenting because I’m in the same boat.
Gmail was so handy because it did a good job at filtering the spam and offered customization. But it’s doing a worse job at the spam and not a good enough one at customization. Where should I go?
Proton mail? Some similar platform?
I’m terrible at maintaining my email but I check it often enough.
This makes me sad.
20 years? Jamie pull that up.