… except in 100, when it doesn’t, except again in 400, then it does.

the locks are quite basic though, literally pickable with a hair pin

the idea is that to get to be the one spraying, you have to know first hand how much pain you are inflicting.

One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.

No it doesn’t negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.

Cry me a river.

great argument.

• It helps spread false information widely

• It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands

• It hurts the underlying sources

When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It’s an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.

this is problematic on multiple levels.

This is not applicable to arch tho

Each package is updated independently, you pull updates whenever you feel like it, be that monthly or every five minutes

wha?

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

ground water is a completely different beast. This device harvests moisture from the air.

You are wrong on that last part

In accordance with Nobel’s will, the prize is selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member committee appointed by the Parliament of Norway unlike all the other awards chosen by the Swedish Nobel Committee.

It’s easy to crush the competition when you purposely take a loss as an investment in future market share.

no, but misuse, yes.

Those are illegal in most places, just fyi

oh, I hadn’t the slightest

yes???

[I was probably wrong, disregard]