no?

if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.

That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.

Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.

eh, you know what, fair enough!

way to shift blame

oh wow I didn’t know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

deleted by creator

It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.

What would be better though?
I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

deleted by creator

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.

This could have been amazing if integrated into a district heating network.

2 adults and 4 children were hurt according to the article, no one life threatening. None of the injured are visible in the video.

♫ Voulez-Vous Coucher Avec Moi Ce Soir ♫

Yes, I can imagine. It’s done literally all the time, in every genre.

this sends a clear message though. No the old “just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever” isn’t actually working. That’s great.

Thats why I’m saying borders on. I know it’s not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.

Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?