• 110 Posts
  • 839 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 13th, 2024

help-circle
  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlMany such cases
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 minutes ago

    Piece of shit. Simple and to the point. Shit’s pretty gross and it’s universal human instinct to avoid it. Maybe even shithead if you want a single word.

    Asshole. Gender neutral and not tied to ethnicity since we all have one. Maybe even going further and calling someone an asshole related condition like prolapsed rectum or hemorrhoid, things that can happen to anyone, are pretty painful and definitely to be avoided, but AFAIK were never conditions that were heavily marginalized or shamed.

    Clown or fool. Clowns/fools are types of characters people played historically (and still do?), IMO it doesn’t imply anything about a person’s actual intelligence or mental state, only their actions. You’re not born a clown or fool, but you can definitely act like one. Also lends itself to a snarky 🤡 emoji I’ve seen some people here use instead of typing out an insult.

    Though there could be additional context or history to any of these terms I’m not aware of that push them into one of the -ist categories, IDK I’m not a linguist.



  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlJunoir vs Senior
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Is Erlang special in its architecture or is it more that it’s functional?

    One day I’ll learn how to do purely functional, maybe even purely declarative. But I have to train my brain to think of computer programs like that.

    Is there a functional and/or declarative language that has memory management features similar to Rust as opposed to a garbage collector?


  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlJunoir vs Senior
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    but literally beating the flagship desktop chips in single-core performance

    See, this is what I despise about x86. AFAIK it’s literally RISC on the bare metal but there are hundreds of “instructions” running microcode which is basically just a translation layer. You’re not allowed to write code for the actual RISC implementation because that’s a trade secret or something. So obviously single core performance would be shit because you’re basically running an emulator all the time.

    RISC-V can’t come fast enough. Maybe someone will even make a chip that’s RISC-V but with the same instruction/microcode support as x86. So you can run RISC-V code directly or do the microcode thing and pretend you’re on x86. Though that would probably get the shit sued out of them by Intel because god forbid there’s actual innovation that the original creator can’t cash in on.








  • Just a reminder, you can’t prove they’re not still conscious somewhere in their mind. Brain “dead” is a misnomer because having dead, rotting tissue in your skull will kill you pretty quickly anyway. You would at the very least have to remove the brain and IDK if you can still keep the body alive then.

    Keeping them alive normally honestly sounds like torture if there’s anything resembling a consciousness still in there, this is just slavery.






  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoComics@lemmy.mlPeek-A-Boo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Also, commenting again because I just remembered that I’ve definitely seen depictions of him tied to the cross with rope. Probably because they don’t want to show blood and gore in, say, religious material for children or something? Not sure.

    Still, the idea that you’re okay with showing the public execution of your God but blood is where you draw the line is kind of silly to me.





  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoComics@lemmy.mlPeek-A-Boo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I mean, regardless of whether Jesus was God or got crucified or not I assume they meant the wrists were the “standard” way the Romans nailed people to crosses? Presumably because the hand bones are pretty weak compared to the joint attaching your two forearm bones and they’d just fall off after a day or two? IDK I’ve never crucified anyone.