The land under your house is owned by the Indigenous people you stole it from. So while you may “own” the structure, when Indigenous law is restored after the illegitimate occupation falls, you will be told to GTFO.

🙂‍↔️🫸

😊👉 🙂‍↔️🫸 😊👉

Ones of bytes instead of tens or hundreds of kilobytes.

The freezing homeless people you pass every day in glorious freedomland would love one of those.

Slop CEO says what?

🙂‍↔️🫸 “Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)”

😊👉 “American Schutzstaffel (ASS)”

The Developer ID certificate is the digital signature macOS uses to verify legitimate software. The certificate that Logitech allowed to lapse was being used to secure inter-process communications, which resulted in the software not being able to start successfully, in some cases leading to an endless boot loop.

This is 100% on Apple users for letting a company decide what their computer can and can’t run. And then brag about its security like it has some super special zero trust architecture and is not just a walled garden with a single point of failure dependent on opaque decision making criteria for what code should be “allowed” to run on the system.

Key and signature based security model does not prove if it’s safe, it proves if it’s approved. They’re not the same.

Macs don’t get malware. Unless it’s malware Apple approves, those are called apps.

“Switzerland will do its best to ensure these benefit the Venezuelan population”

Doubt

Rationalize why “elections are overrated, actually.”

it was called CROSS PLATFORM APPS

Absolutely not unless it’s as sandboxed as the web (which even the web isn’t sandboxed that well).

Working with software has only made me not trust software (that’s not open source.)

Why we’re giving any random software full user level access in 2026 is beyond me.

brings the dream of endless energy even closer

Yeah that’s not “close” until we figure out how to do fusion with regular hydrogen, you know, like the sun. When your fusion requires unstable and/or extremely rare isotopes it’s not even going to be viable compared to fission, let alone solving our energy problem.

So hot everything’s red.

AKA the final stage of evolution

Because US regime changes have such a high rate of improving the lives of the people. Sure.

“I develop customer retention algorithms for gambling apps.”

The Chinese student thing gets a solid “shut the fuck up with your tired hypocritical stereotypes” and from me (not directed towards you, Lemmy poster).

Reposting the screenshots here too:

https://web.archive.org/web/20260102072013/https://www.reddit.com/r/confession/comments/1q1mzej/im_a_developer_for_a_major_food_delivery_app_the/

I’ve heard reasons for it like "women’s bathroom needs places to dispose of pads/tampons but, like, it’s a box on the wall. Put one in both.

Also heard reasons along the lines of “men are faster at using the bathroom so why should we need to share with women” (even though with single bathrooms the washing your hands part is the time bottleneck, not the peeing part) or just general disgust at the idea of sharing a bathroom with the other gender (have heard it from both genders).

I think having a TPM enables a number of worthwhile security features.

But most of those security features place the TPM at the root of trust, something that is SEVERELY undermined by the fact that it is not open source, meaning it is inherently untrustworthy.

Is it not the one chip we should demand and accept nothing less than complete openness in its implementation and complete control by the person who owns the device? I also think the types of protections it grants in theory are very good, but the fact that it’s proprietary means it’s terrible at actually granting you those protections.

Damn my definition of “model” has been really skewed lately, I thought it was some kind of neural network for shading.

AKA the idea Elon stole for the Hyperloop, but less stupid.