The more you see a product advertised, the less of their earnings are going towards making a better product

This might just be me, but an exclamation point ruins this joke, and many similar ones

With no exclamation point, I read this as a very dry, very serious response, and the comedy comes from the absurdity of what’s said with a straight face

When I see the exclamation mark, my brain goes “BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER”

These kinds of charts are usually used to compare things that, in this case, wouldn’t be science, but humourously could be considered science if given a chance

But the other guy is right-if you don’t follow the scientific method and don’t try to describe your findings in ways that attempt to better understand the universe, then that’s not science. That’s bias

about to chime in with my experience

realise this is a linux instance

start crying in windows user

Damn bro, I’m going to have to start using it then

…no it’s not?

Edit: yes it is

If you want a good front end alternative to youtube, try freetube on pcs and newpipe on android

I feel like the only person in the world who dislikes oreos

After Ublock, its easily my favourite addon

This might be a hot take, but i prefer the compressed graphics of the original in most games over the 4k rerenders

I agree that English is a constantly changing language, with many words meaning the same thing or single words meaning multiple different things. It’s the case with the male man, derived from werman, as is such with many other words

But your point ignores what I was trying to say

Anybody who feels the need to specify gender with such limited information is simply being sexist. Neither male nor female should be assumed in this instance

This goes for people other than those in the post; scholars and students should be held accountable alike

Whether these historic individuals were male or female is irrelevant. Only their creations truly matter

I’m confused by this quote - no sane person would assume a male did something just because we say man did it. In this instance, man would simply be referencing humanity

The want to define whether a male or female did it without any evidence is simply sexist

I’m not

As a kid who had a dad that religiously blocked any and all use of technology, I agree the right step is to allow access to it instead of taking it all away

This kind of made me revere videogames and the internet as a whole, using them whenever I had the chance, only realising I maybe shouldn’t be on them all hours of the day after I moved out

Even then, it was a hard habit to break

Restriction is a hard line to balance, and I wish you luck with it