We have ‘Upload’ at home.

Two birds, one stone. Lol

Yes.

I’m more of a

‘top ten percent of the wine bottle’: we should invest in healthcare for all.

‘bottom ten percent of the bottle’: Pulls up photos of the Barbara pit

Let’s commodify pollutants like some sort of Villain of the week on Captain Planet.

Kurt Russell also comes to mind, again, within the limitations of Hollywood.

Is this confirmed?

You mean to tell me that the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles?

Btw this was an excellent article! I have it bookmarked now.

I actually went through a few of those links and they don’t say much at all, or reframe the reasons the students are there while only quoting irrelevant statements.

Here is a simple illustration. Let us take a shoemaker who owned a tiny workshop, but who, unable to withstand the competition of the big manufacturers, closed his workshop and took a job, say, at Adelkhanov’s shoe factory in Tiflis. He went to work at Adelkhanov’s factory not with the view to becoming a permanent wage-worker, but with the object of saving up some money, of accumulating a little capital to enable him to reopen his workshop. As you see, the position of this shoemaker is already proletarian, but his consciousness is still non-proletarian, it is thoroughly petty-bourgeois. In other words, this shoemaker has already lost his petty-bourgeois position, it has gone, but his petty-bourgeois consciousness has not yet gone, it has lagged behind his actual position.

Clearly, here too, in social life, first the external conditions change, first the conditions of men change and then their consciousness changes accordingly.

But let us return to our shoemaker. As we already know, he intends to save up some money and then reopen his workshop. This proletarianized shoemaker goes on working, but finds that it is a very difficult matter to save money, because what he earns barely suffices to maintain an existence. Moreover, he realizes that the opening of a private workshop is after all not so alluring: the rent he will have to pay for the premises, the caprices of customers, shortage of money, the competition of the big manufacturers and similar worries — such are the many troubles that torment the private workshop owner. On the other hand, the proletarian is relatively freer from such cares; he is not troubled by customers, or by having to pay rent for premises. He goes to the factory every morning, calmly goes home in the evening, and as calmly pockets his pay on Saturdays. Here, for the first time, the wings of our shoemaker’s petty-bourgeois dreams are clipped; here for the first time proletarian strivings awaken in his soul.

Time passes and our shoemaker sees that he has not enough money to satisfy his most essential needs, that what he needs very badly is a rise in wages. At the same time, he hears his fellow-workers talking about unions and strikes. Here our shoemaker realizes that in order to improve his conditions he must fight the masters and not open a workshop of his own. He joins the union, enters the strike movement, and soon becomes imbued with socialist ideas… [2]

Thus, in the long run, the change in the shoemaker’s material conditions was followed by a change in his consciousness: first his material conditions changed, and then, after a time, his consciousness changed accordingly.

The same must be said about classes and about society as a whole.

Bahahaha!

In my search, I found this.

Marie Schrader

You wanna be trapped in a work cube for hours?

Also, the Undertaker threw Mankind from 16ft into the announcer’s table.

This is more 00’s. Mid-00’s it was DVDs full of homework lol