Both. Both is good.

I went from Nova to Niagara and I love it!

Although I agree with you, I have heard the argument in other contexts.

The “It’s just an LLM” card is quickly drawn as soon as minor errors or anomalies become apparent. It’s “just a machine that strings together somewhat logical sentences.”

Even though this ability makes the program more intelligent than some people I know.

This sums up in a funny way what I’ve been thinking for a long time: There is often disparaging talk about ChatGPT being “just” an LLM. But the whole logic behind it is not that different from many natural processes.

I don’t know, but it looks like Raphael has his own reasons to be there.

My experience has been different. Even without Spotify, I’ve found a large number of new bands over the years through websites, reviews, and music videos on YouTube. This shows that there are multiple ways to discover diverse music.

My main concern is about the broader impact of streaming on the music industry. While Spotify can be a fantastic tool for discovering music, it’s important to consider how its business model and algorithms might influence musical production and consumption patterns. Yes, artists do receive royalties from radio plays, but the system is different from streaming. My worry is that the streaming model, especially in terms of payment structures and engagement strategies, might inadvertently prioritize certain types of music, potentially overshadowing the rich diversity in the music world.

Absolutely, I’m aware of the Top 40, but my point is about how services like Spotify are amplifying the dominance of this type of quickly digestible music. While the Top 40 has always reflected popular tastes, Spotify intensifies the focus on ephemeral hits rather than promoting a diverse range of music and independent artists. Additionally, the technology behind Spotify, where artists or labels aren’t compensated if a track is skipped within the first 30 seconds, further influences this trend. It shapes not only what we listen to but also how we value music.

I believe Spotify is largely responsible for its own financial struggles. Knowing that 2/3 of their revenue goes to the greedy labels, they should consider scaling back on operational costs and excessive investments in advertising and celebrity podcast deals.

In a way, it serves them right. Spotify plays a significant role in transforming music into a product akin to fast food, prioritizing mass consumption over artistic value. This approach not only impacts their profitability but also contributes to a broader devaluation of music as an art form.

So fuck Spotify.

No. Reality can’t be better than expectations.

Look at the official announcement they were replying to.

Here is the official announcement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl5PGoy5X6g

If anyone had asked me which rock band would be the first to come out with this kind of crap, I would have said KISS anyway.

So: The better the tacos, the more dangerous the neighborhood? To test this, you should manipulate the tacos in bad neighborhoods and see how it develops.

He tweeted this picture in 2012.

“Wore Marquis de Sade outfit for a party last night. Was v popular with women who’d read 50 Shades :)”

He was fired due to some discrepancy. Nadella said directly that he didn’t like it. And when he can’t use his 49% to bring Altman back, he hires him himself.

Without sarcasm: that makes total sense to me.

DEUTSCH

There are more?

No one knows. That’s why we should try.

They should try something with magnets.

SpongeBob stayed underwater. He still has to work and has a lot on his plate.