I feel like you do not understand the difference between asking for the meaning of a meme and doing actual research about a topic you want to learn something on. And if you really think those are the same… lmao.
I feel like you do not understand the difference between asking for the meaning of a meme and doing actual research about a topic you want to learn something on. And if you really think those are the same… lmao.
It’s a parody of what some news outlets might write about this
I don’t use an LLM as a primary source of information; this is just about a meme I don’t understand. Either I just let it explain it to me or… I don’t, and scroll further.
And genuinely, if you think it cannot, then explain it you to me. I doubt that it’s different than the explanation I got.
I’m glad ChatGPT can explain stuff like that to me because I’ve never heard of Pedro Pascal before and initially assumed he was the man in the image.
Germany didn’t do anything like that. Britain tried to ban porn like this but realized it’s a terrible idea and stepped back from it.
Average pull request
As someone who has never heard of that: What would have been its advantages over Lemmy?
But… they can’t access the microphone without the user explicitly allowing
But I like gpg more :(
Friends hate this one simple trick!
Why wouldn’t they?
Yeah, but that… doesn’t really matter. So it doesn’t really make sense to post that here, especially with that headline.
Now do it by displaying the video directly in the terminal (using colored blocks and the line delete feature like progress bars do) before it’s executed.
Edit: Apparently, mpv can already be used for that, maybe you can use it as dependency :P
I don’t see why the concept should be unethical.
In practice, of course it is insanely unethical as the algorithms are designed to maximize view time which leads to algorithmic radicalization and hate spreading more quickly, but the concept of an algorithm knowing and learning what you like and selecting for you itself isn’t unethical.
This is just sad
LLMs are one version of AI. It’s just one tiny part of AIs that are used every day, from chess bots to voice transcription, but they also are AI.
Actually, fair point. While the Anthropic judge case is awful for artists and such, it is actually a great thing for libraries and especially the internet archive, which has faced heavy pressure in the last years.
It’s really ironic that the public good library that has been facing heavy pressure from giant corporations is now… being saved by other giant cooperations which are now deemed more important