Kumikommunism [they/them]

lack of focus on certain demographics

There was no “lack of focus” lmao. They focused very hard on telling every demographic that matters to go fuck themselves in different ways. Arabs were told genocide is good, Latinos were told immigration is bad, and black people were told that if they wanted to not be poor, they should buy crypto and start a business.

Joe Biden is currently ordering the bombing and shooting of little children in the head in the name of racial supremacy to uphold a genocidal apartheid state.

Takes one to know one.

I would tell you to vote for PSL but the anti-Democratic party won their court case to ban their opponents from the elections in Pennsylvania.

Edit: you can vote for the Green party to show the Dems that you are willing to vote, but not for their policies.

This is literally a lie.

Seems pretty straightforward.

I always see pithy cliches like this at the end of the most incorrect comments. It’s the most Reddit thing ever.

…So is that a yes? If you respond to the question “hey, are you racist?” like that, I think we both know what that means.

Do you consider Arabs to be inhuman?

If not, care to explain?

If so, I think I found the fascist.

Oh, I get you. This is kind of like how Trump will do “even more genocide” than Kamala. Big number is worse than smaller number. It’s cool if Killer Kamala lies 100 times and kills 40,000 Arab children, Trump is going to lie 120 times and kill 42,000 Arab children.

You are very good at dogmatically supporting your political football team and not sounding like a complete child.

Because you don’t want to look at the bill because you’re racist and hate immigrants, multiple people have responded with multiple sources including the bill itself.

Now it’s already very clear to everyone here that your “stance” wouldn’t be changed by anything and you’re simply masking your apathy and racism by feigning scepticism, but are you even going to try and come back here and pretend otherwise? I highly doubt it, but hopefully your brilliant truth-seeking mind will prove me wrong!

YTDLnis is better, in my opinion.

https://github.com/deniscerri/ytdlnis

Maybe looks a bit less “clean” (still looks great though) but the downloading menu has every option in an easy place. I really don’t like how Seal hides all the important options for the sake of simplicity.

All of the good video downloaders are just a wrapper for using this, so it’s not really “instead”.

Ooh, thanks for the GlazeWM shout, that’s awesome. I use vim keybinds in as many programs as I can and that is awesome for switching between the browser and terminal or text editor.

If it’s on YouTube, then Sponsorblock will work on it as well. (Given someone has marked the sections, which is almost always)

Vimium-C is a rewrite and is better, and more well-documented.

https://github.com/gdh1995/vimium-c

Sure, Muslims are being slaughtered every day, children are being shot in the head while walking down the street, hospitals are basically halfway to being morgues, but how could you possibly hold anyone to higher standards?!?!

Expecting someone to be anti-genocide is way too far!

Well, you are correct, in a way. The Harris/Walz ticket has a very large chance to commit genocide if elected. That’s something that Claudia & Karina have zero chance of doing.

You should be proud!

The citations and author for several of them are right there in the image. Are you visually impaired? Again, I must ask, is it simply the content that you disagree with, but you don’t have any actual arguments against it? That’s what this seems like to me.

Well, I’m curious which ones you tried finding any information on, and which ones were difficult for you? The one that is an attributed quote is especially easy to find. The one with the exact title of a news article is also very easy to find. And one is a reference to a widely publicized act he took in office during a series of nationwide protests about which many news articles are incredible easy to find with keywords. The last one is also very easy to find with keywords.

You’re implying some of it is not true, I think. So what did you do to verify them, and which ones were you unable to? Surely you aren’t just pretending to care about misinformation but not putting any effort into verification yourself, right? Does that only go for facts you already like?

The text is quite readable and this seems to be an attention-grabbing poster with some visuals. What’s wrong with the text?

Or is it perhaps the content that you have a problem with?

Genociders gonna genocide. I really would love to see all the snarky liberals like you try and give your snide remarks in front of a Palestinian whose child was blown to pieces or who lost all their limb function from being shot while walking down the street.

I’m quite sure you are not brave enough.

I found a citation for every single one of these easily. Which one are you struggling to verify?

Surely, you…you know…did some work to verify your beliefs instead of sticking your head in the sand…right?