Lols [they/them]

i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

you can be annoyed about something someone is doing without making some personal judgement about that someone

if my train is late because the train driver had a heart attack im aware that its not the drivers fault, but im still not going to be thrilled about my luck

this is an extraordinarily terrible title

thats an extremely weird assumption to make as a lemmy user

im not particularly convinced that the shooter was acting in name of a pc gaming fan club

spreading child pornography is in fact illegal in most of the world

they did, and thats commendable

i do not think nations, cultures or people should necessarily be expected to abandon symbols because they were coopted by abhorrent ideologies or people though, and i dont think that framing the use of such symbols as actual symbolism of those abhorreny ideologies or people is fair or accurate

this is pretty interesting, but includes a lot of examples that either dont include a date of introduction or are from before the the national fascist party or even the existence of fascism as a concept

i dont feel like framing examples like that as fascist symbolism is fair or accurate, same as how organisations continuing their pre-nazism usage of the swastika isnt nazi symbolism

do you have a list of examples

can you explain how im supposed to respond to you taking issue with things i never said, so that i can be less debate pervert semantic arguing in the future

You just claimed that our instance “dissuade or encourage” specific views so which is it?

i didnt say that, stop getting hostile over statements you imagined

i said that lemm.ee does not do that

i made 0 statement on how hexbears policies compares to that, just that culturally users there have relatively similar views

second off, do you disagree that hexbears moderators and admins actively endorse and encourage leftist ideals, and discourage liberalism and fascism

We’re all the same

i didnt say that, stop getting hostile over statements you imagined

i said that you are sitting at the same table as the rest of us, despite presumably not being a nazi

or we’re evil tankies who censor innocent little smol bean nazis?

i didnt say that, stop getting hostile over statements you imagined

i definitely thought you censor nazis, do you not censor nazis?

catchy, but youre here on the fediverse commenting on the same posts, talking with the same people and sitting at the same table as the rest of us, you just came in through a different door

your shitting on folks because they used the wrong https isnt out of some political or moral conviction, its shoddily disguised tribalism

most people do not pick their instance based on political ideals, and lemm.ee mods/admins do not heavily dissuade or encourage specific political views

hexbear has probably gotten you are used to all members of a given instance having relatively similar views, but you should get used to users of other instances not automatically being nazi sympathising shitlibs because they have @lemm.ee behind their name

which is what lemm.ee federation policy should be

deleted by creator

i liked the initiative and reasoning and wouldnt mind it being normalised on the fediverse at large, as opposed to just hexbear

do you feel like hexbear users actively calling for killings, while other hexbear users absolutely swear that ‘theyre actively calling for killings’ is a total misinterpretation of their wholesome culture, is going to hurt your credibility

do you feel like credibility might be useful, for instance if youre actively trying to convince people to change their political views or behaviours

But if you deliberately choose and only enforce the silliest, least serious example then either you’re doing it disingenuously or it’s a blanket, no tolerance approach that treats all cases equally. This is what they went with and as I’ve pointed out it’s not the latter, so I think it’s the former.

thats fair

We had one the other day which claimed that when some one off handedly said Death to NATO they were advocating and planning the genocide of every single person living in a NATO aligned country.

if this is the case i think it is, i understood ‘people of NAVO’ to mean actual NAVO officials, with emphasis on the fact that those are people, especially after their elaboration

as such i didnt read their comment as framing ‘death to NAVO’ as calling for the genocide of every NATO aligned country, rather assuming that it was calling for violence against the people that actually make up the organization

given the image of NATO officials on hexbear, i dont feel like that was an unfair assumption even if its not necessarily an accurate one, and I dont feel like assuming it was done disingenuously is fair especially when taking into account that the person in question still seemed to prefer federation

again, assuming were talking about the same case