Clinging to absolute morality leads nowhere. You shouldn’t punch down.

On the other hand if the number keeps going down it helps strengthen hope that it can go down to 0. When these things happen some apparatus gets left behind on how to do it a again for rogue actors inside the country too.

Europe’s problems are the world’s problems but the world’s problems are never Europe’s problems.

Lol makes me imagine that the alien species have a law against approaching humans or be charged with pedophilia.

Except we shouldn’t be giving corporations same rights as individuals. Doing so leads to corporate feudalism.

Those should be your expectations when you are on the shop floor and that should allow you to reject the purchase if it’s s deal breaker for you. Not when you’re crossing railway tracks.

When it’s been advertised to the user as “full self driving”, is it?

I wouldn’t believe an advertisement.

No because you will be using duckduckgo or something else

Jokes on them, I am a grumpy bastard who hates emotionally expressive humans.

If you kill all your prisoners there’s no hope for reform

Supporting palestine is not supporting terrorists. Can you tell me how many palestinian civilian casualties are recorded till now in Gaza? Can you tell me what is the number or Israelis who died as a result of IDF invasion into Gaza?

If you need something in a pinch to substitute a tool you memorized, skill issue is a valid excuse to reject Linux.

If a theme is able to break core functionality then your theming system/guidelines needs to be fixed. And it to be more accessible to theme designers so these problems don’t occur in the first place.

If you sign here on this legal paper saying YOU will face consequences for a friday deploy then yes I will take you up on this

Now that the foundation is already there, they future work won’t be as complex as before and need less training.

LOL, LMAO even.

This is same as feeling bad for people who think others shouldn’t be getting caught in MLM schemes.

I don’t agree with your argument.

Making a human go to prison for wiping out a family of 4 isn’t going to bring back the family of 4. So you’re just using deterrence to hopefully make drivers more cautious.

Yet, year after year… humans cause more deaths by negligence than tools can cause by failing.

The question is definitely “How much safer are they compared to human drivers”

It’s also much easier to prove that the system has those issues fixed compared to training a human hoping that their critical faculties are intact. Rigorous Software testing and mechanical testing are within legislative reach and can be made strict requirements.

You must understand that maintainers need to worry about supply chain attacks ever since the xz debacle. So I suggest you wait.

It’s supposed to work like that. You’re naive to think it actually does work like that for a majority of companies nowadays.

Yes. Otherwise they’re just preempttively accusing their customers of being theives. Some would consider that libel and slander.