Only way to stop piracy is to make it easier and cheaper to buy the goods legitimately in all corners of the world. Since that won’t be happening, and since so much content is an outright gamble if it’s even any good, piracy will continue to grow.

deleted by creator

Google claimed to be open but ran backroom deals to ensure low competition. In doing so it proved its weight in the industry could squash competition, proving its monopoly, which is illegal.

Apple never made claims it was open.

As simple as. Toss in one case was decided by a jury, and the other a judge, and you’ll quickly see neither are related.

Basically your question was nonsense from the jump, and pushed by blogs and the like to get idiots to click. Had you read the news, you’d get it. By why read when others will explain it for ya.

Well, nobody would have clicked on Ron’s title or linked it to social media if he had put Wear in the hed. Isn’t clickbait fun?

Ha, and that’s if you can even time the order it actually goes through, since they still haven’t improved their store despite repeated instances of resellers buying them out immediately. Gosh, I wonder if they themselves “buy” the product to resell under different names at incredibly elevated prices. Nah, that would be illegal, and corporations clearly follow the law nowadays, right.

And yeah, not only have these chucklefucks done nothing to improve their ordering or stock situation, they can’t code either so software such as for the Pocket is still unfinished and lacking. These shitheads are selling crap on empty promises, and not delivering, all the while keeping the scam going since too few have noticed this company is propped up by years old rumored quality. Sure the hardware is nice, but it’s always late and there’s never enough, which hardly matters when the morons can’t competently write the software to go with it.

Double biggest. Fail. Shoulda been tighter, that’s just lazy. Everything after the emdash is pointless anyways, Google cut the title much earlier. Another fail.

It’s clickbait, you got that right, but it’s super sloppy.

Because they both pull the same censorship so there’s no discernable difference where it matters?

Gimme a call when any website can exist purely on DDG traffic or Bing’s ad platform.

And why do you think they are written in this manner? Does it have something to do with ads? Praytell, who owns the ad platform as well as search?

Pretty balsy to blame the writers, they are simply chasing the algorithm Google makes. In the end, Google does really control it all. So if you wanna be mad at someone, I’d say start with the one forcing everyone to do this.