That makes it sound like the “edible” aspect of this is just an anti idiot feature. *Or just “printed” on it.
Either way, pointless article.
That makes it sound like the “edible” aspect of this is just an anti idiot feature. *Or just “printed” on it.
Either way, pointless article.
Stealing and selling their best prototype also means they couldn’t send it to a better reviewer to demonstrate it isn’t a bad product.
Honestly atrocious behaviour from them over this. Any 1 bit of this would be bad, but all of them together could absolutely ruin a start-up. And all because Linus didn’t want to spend “up to” $500 worth of people’s time.
Must be changing the price a bit? Saw a lot of reports earlier it was $20 ish USD.
Not American though, so all I know is it was $33AUD when I bought it earlier. That matches up with the $20 ish USD
That would be for ultra for life mind. To remove ads forever is $20 USD I believe.
Pretty sure YouTube messes with it on desktops as well. Might default higher, but I had to use that advanced YouTube add on to force it to 1440p (or next highest) because it would constantly make me select it.
Difference is definitely noticeable on modern phones. But the biggest issue is it will do this on desktop and tablets as well, where you will really notice the difference.
And like you said, YouTube 480p mode doesn’t have 60fps. That’s noticeable regardless of screen size.
Even with high speed internet it seems to always default to 480p.
It’ll update to 720p or 1080p a few minutes in sometimes. But in general it’s just a large inconvenience.
Will wait to see how it plays out. Seems that the Exynos 2400 is expected to be less crap then the past few gens of Exynos processors, so so long as it’s not going to crater battery life or performance vs the Snapdragon models I’m not fussed.