sadly, no. Anticheat Systems are designed to be paranoid as fuck. So even some readout of the hardware used that WINE handles a tad differently than Windows might trip it.

You know nothing, Gandalf the Grey!

That’s what happens around any toilet in a 2km radius when Taco Bell has a major sale.

One does not simply have a nice day when Winter is coming.

Same in German.

With you in a cart or something

Oh, you actually believed that story? Whoops. Sorry! It was actually me who ate your Cheetos and downed your Vodka.

It doesn’t. It will require you to reboot for every god-damned line of code that has changed.

Na, nothing. Did an update today. Nothing bad happened at al, Because why would it?

Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.

I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently? Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from “algorithm is to blame for deaths” into “algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases”, which of course it can’t…

I dislike that a) it’s considered binary, while the vast majority of people will not be even close to either extreme b) people put themselves into those extremes anyway, throw around the wildest (and mostly useless) definitions of what “being an introvert” is supposed to mean, more often than not dripping with victim mentality c) people use their supposed status akin to a neurodiversity d) people openly blaming others for not being allowed to be like they are because others dare to be like they are (“I have it so hard in life because I’m an introvert in a world full of extroverts”) e) people define large chunks of themselves around some label they largely defined themselves and want this label to be respected as if it was a real thing, an illness almost. f) people define large chunks of themselves around some label that is just meant to very loosely describe some aspect of a human being’s character, not the whole human

Let’s see how many “definitions” of supposed “introverts” or “extroverts” we get this time. It’s pop-psychology BS, people. Nothing more.

Yeah, the old internet was rotten to the core.

If life gives you lemons, have your scientists make lemon grenades out of them

They’ve got no time to post because they’re busy watching all the things they want without taking on another job to pay for another dozen or so subscriptions.

I’ll tell you when you’re old enough.

You still have Netflix?

You added the “…and willing” part by yourself there.

I’m not sure if you actually know how “making out” works. Like… At all

Edit: Wait a goddamn minute! You keep virtue signaling here how sexist and sexual assaulty this meme is and posted this power fantasy trip of a response yourself?!

“Did you expect you were enough. Work for it!”

Get out of here!

What the heck?! Dude, this meme is not about that.