He could have been anything at that point. His political affiliation doesn’t need to match his behavior if his only purpose is to unwittingly die for a failed-attempt to grab a few votes.
He could have been anything at that point. His political affiliation doesn’t need to match his behavior if his only purpose is to unwittingly die for a failed-attempt to grab a few votes.
You seriously believe that wasn’t staged? That patsy’s second to his last thought was about how he’d spend all the money he was promised….
… his last thought was interrupted by the bullet passing through it.
People will believe whatever the internet tells them to.
Neat!
I wasn’t sure, so I went ahead and I checked the guest-list for this specific corner of the discussion and surprisingly- you’re not on it. Meaning- No one invited you to come here and pretend that you have any part in it.
Yet here you are, accusing me of being uncivil in response to your little temper-tantrum?
I get the feeling that there’d be far less people like you around here if self-awareness was implemented as mandatory curriculum. But I digress….
As for your disdain of my penchant for colorful parlance? Well, verily without prompt, I perpend that though mayest o’er-rauhot thine aversion to proclivity and hastily fornicate thyself with nigh but the expertly expedience of one so deserved of such an unpregnant act.
And now, so as to avoid having to suffered the slings and arrows of your outrageous aspersions,
I bid thee….
a day.
Now, go ahead with your bait tactics. I love seeing what little tricks you all try to use to goad me into the argument you crave so dearly.
It’s like I can predict the future! (Naaah. It’s just that you’re so darned predictable!)
Oh, to add:
Rule 1 says to be “civil and nice” but we both know that only pertains to people on the other side of your argument.
Oh make no mistake, I have no desire whatsoever to waste my time trying to illustrate the concept of nuance in a discussion here. Whether it be about politics or government operated socio-economic systems- I’ve been on lemmy long enough to see how you all operate here, and debate on these topics is an exercise is abject futility.
I’m simply here, for no other purpose than to warn a fellow user before they fall victim to the time-sink that is debating with pseudo-socialists and communists….
Nothing more.
Now, go ahead with your bait tactics. I love seeing what little tricks you all try to use to goad me into the argument you crave so dearly.
Who in their right mind would want to talk to AI begin with? I don’t think I’ll ever understand why someone would want to do this outside of a single instance of curiosity.
It’s not a school night.
See, the mistake you made was assuming anyone here is capable of understanding how nuanced debate works. It’s all or nothing around here. And if you so much as merely imply that communism/russia/authoritarianism/china is flawed in any way-
You get your comment removed and face the possibility of having you yourself removed.
I’d strongly suggest you search elsewhere if you’re looking for an actual conversation on topics like this, because speaking southward in a northbound wind-tunnel won’t ever result in anyone getting the message.
ROFL!
What’s the over-under that more tracking software is urging along on this update?
Sooooo edgy.
No, that’s not all you heard about it and we both know it. You just like stirring the pot with edgy rhetoric.
Exactly. That’s my point. He created these shows. And so many people have zero faith that he’d create a quality reboot.
If you’d have read Bill Lawrence’s interview on the subject, you’d know that’s this isn’t about money. And I’d trust the guy who created Ted Lasso and shrinking to do what it takes to make this worth watching.
I’ve a feeling it’ll end up being some altered form of PVD.