Pushing a shitty launcher, selling partial games, missing versions of games, selling games with DRM, implementing DRMs through their launcher… Basically everything that GoG is supposed to specifically avoid.

If you write code without understanding what you’re doing, to the point where an AI is achieving better results, you should question your choices.

Considering how gog has been progressing over the past years, they’ll have to do much more to prove that they are getting better than to make an announcement.

Until then, I’ll remain critical.

I don’t think clapping as soon as a company that has been doing a lot of crap over years, makes an announcement about one potential future improvement, is more logical than that.

Only what, 10 years late?

The guy literally said that he didn’t want to bother learning python and that it’s why he used this crap.

If that’s not intellectual laziness I don’t know what is.

Because anyone can fall for stupid shit.

Tldr, he’s fine with it because he was lazy

Dumber?

Have you not seen the state of humanity?

I can also predict it, with a crystal ball and tarot cards, and it’s probably going to be as safe if not more

Ah yes, what could go wrong

They make a big deal out of saying that they hand-pick games and make sure they’re good and proper, then they take responsibility of quality problems of the games that are available.

And last I checked you cannot filter. If you do a search, sure, but not on the main page, and during times like around Valentine’s day, the website starts looking like a weird porn website. Also, they claim that they select good games, and no one is going to make me believe that those porn games are good quality games.

Yeah, totally not a nazi perspective, after all no crimes of war were committed in the name of science ever

I mean, you can try freelancing but it’s not really a nice environment

They’ve been pushing a stupid launcher for tracking, have been selling non-up-to-date games, non-drm-free games, incomplete games (ex: no linux version while it is on steam), pushing weird porn games on the front page just because they sell, etc.

It’s been getting worse and worse over the past ~5 years, and I never saw it get better.

Gog has been going to shit so it cannot get much worse.

That’s why the effort needs to be done to stop AIs legally, and by disabling profit from them (or disabling capitalism altogether but that’s another subject), not by continuing to maintain the hype and investments in AIs.

Ah, finally, a way to make more AI crap. Because we needed to have more of it.

So we have vaccines that work and are tested.

And he’s trying to sell something that is untested, but an alcoholic beverage, which is known to be bad for health.

Yeah, I’m sure this is not just about money and he actually cares about people’s health.

Yeah so you’re really set on talking to yourself.

I am talking about objectification. The concept of showing someone as primarily an attractive body, as if they were nothing else.

And yes, just in star trek I mentioned instances of it, and I didn’t even get started on shits like Enterprise.

Of course comic books have an extreme tendency to show unrealistic body standards, and the fact that the idea of a “normal” guy now is a bodybuilder says a lot, but that’s not about objectification. When Star Trek shows Riker naked in his bathtub just for the sake of it, yeah, that is. And yes I’m against it.

I think you are so stuck in your vision of things that you just cannot admit that someone would see things differently.

Yes and sexism is about gender, not sex.

But sure, let’s continue on this bad faith argument, since my point was that I am against objectification of both men and women, so whether it is about sex and gender it’s the same since it’s related to neither. So how is it sexist?

Yeah, indeed.

Still waiting for you to explain how something is sexist when it’s not related to gender btw.