In the interest of making criticisms factually correct, they don’t “sell” user data, they make money through targeted advertising using user data. They actually benefit by being the only ones with your data, it’s not in their interest to sell it.

I mean, both those aired well after 3rd Rock ended. I also think it’s a bit silly to call something not a pop culture hit because it isn’t as popular as the two biggest pop culture hits of the 2000s.

I’m at a Data Engineer and I alternative caps lock and non caps lock at random

AEUGH?!

I don’t know what those lists are, but 3rd Rock and Home Improvement are totally pop culture hits in my mind

But it was a very popular highly rated show

What if users find the article itself to be misinformative, is that something moderators will look at if reported with evidence?

I feel like there was a big push for quantity of content on Lemmy, so everyone set up bots to push content to Lemmy and now we’re stuck with a bunch of shitty content on Lemmy lol.

I’m sure that would have really hurt my feelings if I knew absolutely nothing about myself.

Clearly your head is so far up your own ass that you don’t know anything about yourself. Do you really think I’m here to “hurt feelings”? Says more about you than it does about me doesn’t it.

“Kid”? What is this, early 2000s internet? Do you want to threaten to beat me up irl too? Fuck off dude, you’re irrelevant, stop acting like the world is ending because you could never figure out how to turn on a printer. The world wasn’t better when you were young, your shitty attitude is evidence of that.

Haha what? You quoted my response to your Andrew Tate nonsense and asked who “they” was. There was no “they” in the part of my comment you quoted, so “they” is from your comment. But sure, I’ll be a clown here, why not lmao.

Here’s your comment since you’re having trouble with the technological intricacies of the scroll bar:

"

No, hard stop. Not even fucking close.

Articulate the group of people you’re talking about then so we can actually discuss them, rather than you just insisting they’re everything you pinkie promise they were.

"

Lol what the fuck are you talking about? “They” in that context was the “millions of boys and young men” who see Andrew Tate as a role model. This is all from your comment. Haha are you finding it hard to keep track of your fragmented delusional arguments on the internet? Go back to complaining about “people these days” and how much smarter you were back in the day lol.

Why is tech particular vulnerable to high interest rates?

What? That was a direct response to your comment. I quoted you, “they” is from your comment lol. Try reading that again.

you just insisting they’re everything you pinkie promise they were.

Do you really think that I have to provide evidence to disprove bullshit anecdotal claims that were never proven in the first place? That’s not how discussion works.

Are they the majority? No, probably not.

No, hard stop. Not even fucking close. Your examples are confirmation bias.

nor a time where they’ve wielded so much power.

Do you not remember the Christian groups of the… 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s? They always have, you just weren’t informed via the internet about it.

Dropbox isn’t some tech bro startup anymore…

Doesn’t that just show young people are informed to the point that American conservatives have to resort to general silliness and outrage to get their shitty base of mainly older generations to vote?

I think you’re confusing the loud minority for the majority

Yeah I mean instead you just had an entire country pretty much unanimously vote for Reagan economics that we’re still feeling the brutal effects of today while the dissenting voices were just entirely unheard.

People are louder, they aren’t stupider. Shit, at least 2016 was split.

Shit, covers blown!

Clips, which launched in 2016