• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • Most of the back and forth is predicated on the idea that the digital world works the same as the digital one. It does not!

    In the physical world you cannot produce and exact copy of something for zero dollars.

    In the digital world you can make many copies at effectively zero cost.

    Stealing, theft, is predicated on taking something from someone so they no longer have it.

    Making a digital copy does not steal or remove access.

    The whole argument, which I would posit is deeply flawed, is that pirating removes imaginary potential profits for reselling the thing copied (not stolen). If that’s so then prove it. Prove that at some point in the future I, or any other given person, would have bought that digital thing. Unless you’ve invented time travel you just can’t.

    Copying digital content isn’t theft and pirating isn’t the right thing to call it.

    We have to figure out how to better frame or address the digital world that just fundamentally doesn’t operate the same as the physical one.






  • I think part of this that I’m not seeing talked about, and perhaps confused for “more tech savvy users”, is just the user hostility of Windows.

    9 times out of 10 when a Linux app or game crashes I get a verbose error and more often than not one that I can simply copy and paste.

    9 times out of 10 when Windows, or much of windows software, crashes it gives some random number or code and in a window I can’t even copy and paste out of.

    My skill level doesn’t change. Linux just isn’t user hostile in nature making it easy to search for fixes and report issues. Where as on windows I can’t summon the care or effort to manually transcribe the error so I can then do something with it.









  • Tekchip@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mljust wait, it could get worse....
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mainframes and old databases? It was 98/99 not 88/89. I spent all my time updating Netscape navigator, Windows and Java in my IT job for a fortune 500. I’m sure someone was still running crazy old stuff, someone always is, but it was solidly the age of the internet by then. I had a cable modem by that time.


  • Tekchip@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As monstrous as it is yyyy-mm-dd could also be misconstrued by said unfortunate Americans as yyyy-dd-mm because…well…yeah. As noted elsewhere this dd mmm yyyy format also works nicely in written and verbal communication as 12th of august where no one ever is going to write or speak to each other twenty twenty three august twelfth. So again, more universal and less ambiguous.


  • Tekchip@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As monsterous as it is yyyy-mm-dd could also be misconstrued by said unfortunate Americans as yyyy-dd-mm because…well…yeah. As noted elsewhere this dd mmm yyyy format also works nicely in written and verbal communication as 12th of august where no one ever is going to write or speak to each other twenty twenty three august twelfth. So again, more universal and less ambiguous.


  • Tekchip@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lot of talk of numerics only. The problem there is knowing what format the information is in since clearly there are 3 possibilities. Without context and during certain parts of the month you’re hosed. Best to remove ambiguity and go with the alpha numeric format.

    DD MMM YY (or alternatively YYYY)

    11 Aug 2023

    Ambiguity gone.