https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTRZOYTev4g

I hope so 🙏

Nah you’re still thinking about it within the the UN/long peace legal framework. They can just do a decree that says no mexicans, and their extrajudidical thugs will take the signal to harass and murder truck drivers.

B-but that’s illegal ☝️🤓

Are you going to stop them?

Because he’s a politician and he understands that his rhetoric has to ramp up slowly to convince his audience. Go to your local pub/bar and say that to someone that isn’t a terminally online ML, see how they react.

Slop

Yes. It’s attacking its own institutions. Strange, isn’t it?

Capital finally taking the market out behind the barn.

On a 777 the angels blind you with divine light so you can’t find your way out of the slot machines.

Yes these are also bad.

Organisations aren’t entitled to use automated systems to alter people’s behaviour (i.e. here they’re using an algorithm to maximise the number of ad clicks). It should only be allowed if it’s in the interests of the people affected, and with their (informed) agreement

Ban optimisation without popular consent!

Commie-site keys??? LIBERAL!!! GUT IT!

Nah, they are supposed to be unique. If it was that it’d at least be a design choice potentially worthy of criticism. But consider, who’s more likely to have fucked up a database task: Musk? Or the designer, someone with a degree (a real degree) on this topic?

Don’t worry: since he’s so big on transparency, I’m sure he’ll release the schema so we can check his work… 🙄

Sounds like he got confused looking at a view of a join.

SELECT holder_name, amount
FROM account JOIN transaction ON transaction.account_id=account.id;

-- WTF!! THERE'S DUPLICATES!!!

real 😭