Sorry, if it sounded like you should do the work yourself. What I meant is that I’d advise you to not think too much about your first choice and instead pick up any framework just to get started. Just one of the most popular ones as a starting point. Eventually you’ll understand what you like and dislike about that framework and you’ll have a better practical understanding of your own requirements for a front-end framework. The differences are too specific to study and examine them on paper.

In that case just pick up something and find out for yourself what is relevant to you.

For example, if you go for coffee and forget to come back to work, this child will say what was said when you were not in the hall, and will say who you should counter-attack.

Is this really not the onion?

Even more, if you count water as a drug.

It seems like a lot of people are not even aware of AWS, which leads to an underestimation how badly the world is infected with Amazon.

No.

I switched to Linux, because my very first confrontation to buy a Windows license myself weirded me out. It was quite casual. My exposure to Linux came from a few software development related videos. The workflows I saw looked much more efficient and fulfilling. To be honest, with a dying laptop running on Windows 8.1 I had an extra terrible experience anyway. So when I built my PC and I realized that legally purchasing a Windows license looked like browsing the black market, I decided to save my money and just try Ubuntu. I definitely had the luxury of being able to simply dive in.

They’re not giving you a string, but an error.

Do you mind if I do not do that?

What I meant is that some people portray the thin flat object itself as a 2D object, e.g. a piece of paper opposed to a box. I do understand that it’s intuitive to associate the absence of a dimension with a value close to 0 for it and vice versa, because that’s how we visualize it.

Yes, they are only abstractions, just like numbers are. I do not understand your conclusion that they therefore do not exist.

I still upvoted this, because I can see where you are coming from. It’s frustrating when adults portray thin flat objects as “2D objects” to explain dimensions to children. It’s not a simplification; it’s simply wrong.

Google’s cloud IDE

I disagree. Porn, just like attitude era wrestling and splatter horror games, are precisely targeted at teenagers.

Should they be addicted to porn? No, neither should adults be. Is porn content moderated enough across the internet? No, regardless who watches it.

There is a difference between the influence and reflection of politics in everything we do, and an actively politically motivated action. Not that the latter is a bad thing.

k

Tztztz…didn’t he know that a full virus protection is only achieved when you run apps that run ads?

Recursion

"

To me in most cases it’s the opposite. I don’t watch video tutorials to solve a specific problem (sorry, Roal Van de Paar!), but to get into something. And therefore I prefer to see the problem solving in between and the workflow for that activity. If it really tends to waste my time, I just skip forward.

I will do everything I can do to stop this.

I can see that this can be interpreted as a sabotage. If they are dressed like a clown. With a gun and a pack of sandwiches.