• 17 Posts
  • 3.8K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • Idk who “they” is. But from what I’ve seen, the administrators of Wikipedia tend to bias intake of new power-users and mods to people who have been with the project from inception (or, at least, the earlier the better). You get all sorts of justifications for why they’ve adopted this policy. But the bottom line is that Millennials and GenX make up the overwhelming majority of ranking users. And as they age out, they aren’t being replaced with people who were their age when they started using the platform.

    This traditionalist base has done a lot to calcify how Wikipedia functions, even as variant communities have improved on the model.

    The AI-summary shit is just the tip of the iceberg on the system’s problems. The website is filling up with dead links. The definition of a “trusted news source” is getting outrun by private sector buyouts of old media and unemployed journalists spinning up new media. A big chunk of the organizations’ resources have to deal with fending off legal threats and attacks on system vulnerabilities. The centralized hosting model is expensive to maintain. The rush to be “first to post” creates unnecessary drama among power users in popular niche fields. International language support is… meh (one area where AI would be a huge benefit, as LLMs really shine in this field).

    This goes a lot farther than “they want to hurt my Wiki”. And if you bothered to read the whole article, you might see more of why. The Wiki Foundation has dragged its heels on automation and clustered around a handful of power-mods in a way that’s undermined its Open Editor model. Fighting over Simple Article Summaries is just the latest fumble by the leadership, a sizable commitment of resources that’s tossed in the dump almost as soon as its off the press.








  • Lemmy just BLEW AWAY the LinkedIn Writing Style.

    A few simple witty posts have utterly upended how we communicate on the internet.

    Normal Users:

    • Post replies

    • Up and Downvote

    • Embarassingly minimizing the display when your boss approaches the desk.

    And maybe that works for normal online interactions.

    Sure, it’s fine if you’re an entry level Lemmy user

    But you’ll never change the culture of the internet.

    So we came up with

    Something that’s

    Even better than

    What we used

    To post like

    Before

    We first started using

    This online

    digital service

    For posting our

    Thoughts to

    Other

    Pe

    ople

    It’s called memes.



  • The entire point of the Internet’s infrastructure design was for it to be highly distributed.

    The textbook explainer for the existence of the internet was (at least) two fold:

    • Provide a high speed communication between research universities for conveying large amounts of digital data

    • Devise a system of redundant communication such that any major node going offline would not cripple the international data infrastructure (specifically with an eye towards major natural disasters or nuclear wars).

    But the evolution of the system, from a boutique international data exchange for government enterprises to a business-heavy commercial data system to a retail facing SaaS model degraded both original goals.

    Data is no longer supposed to be public and freely traded. It is jealously guarded as a commodity controlled by a handful of privatized tech giants. And due to the continuous, voracious digital harvesting performed by these tech giants, more and more of the information needs to be siloed, encrypted, and otherwise shielded. This clogs the vast redundant network with overlarge choke-points designed to filter out unwanted traffic and shield the identity/data of its users.

    This isn’t a “US bad” problem. This is a “don’t be stupid, stupid” issue.

    The stupidity is a directly result of how the US private sector repurposed tools layout out by the international public sector. Unregulated solicitations and chronic system intrusions by malicious actors aimed at a naive retail user base, combined with the gluttonous privatization of research data, has inverted the core function of the network.

    And because of the Tragedy of the Commons, there is no single actor who can fix the problem through their own virtue. You can’t unfuck this chicken with a Meshnet or through voluntary individualistic commitments to ideological principles unbound from the central rules of network communication.

    You need the heavy hand of national scale regulators and industry scale redevelopment to re-engineer how the root layers of the internet function if you want to get back to its original design.

    Or… if we’re moving in the direction it seems that we’re moving… we’re going to end up with a wholly proprietary loose confederation of Walled Gardens that look more and more like the Anarcho-Capitalist model of civil government (ie, The Network State).









  • Aurora isn’t really anti-google as it’s merely a different front end for Play (that you can use anonymously).

    You could say the same about Piped, which is just an alt front end for YouTube.

    None of these alternatives seem to tackle the networking effect of the root Google services. None of them address durability, either. Proton VPN launched in 2017, Google’s been around since 1998. Microsoft’s been around since 1975. IBM’s been around since 1911.

    If you don’t mind rebasing your entire digital profile every five or ten years, these alternatives are fine. But most people don’t want to ditch a 20 year old email address or fiddle with a brand new OS, when enshitification can be right around the corner for any of these services in another few years.

    Ffs, I’d just finished putting the shine on my PLEX server before they shit the bed.