Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.

  • 19 Posts
  • 1.06K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • My take is that everyone does it for their own posts, it’s not actually that much effort. And it’s an amount of effort that’s worth it, to make the threadiverse a more welcoming and accessible place. If even one post I transcribe is seen by one blind or vision-impaired user, I’ll consider the work worth it.

    The fediverse broadly is already far better for accessibility than sites like Reddit and Twitter, with users in general far more likely to be aware of things they can do to promote access for users with special needs. But we can still do better, especially our threadiverse corner of the fediverse. Considering one of the reasons for outrage over Reddit dumping their API was the impact on users of blind-focused third-party apps, that’s particularly disappointing.



  • My ideal hope is that by modelling good behaviour, I can encourage more OPs to provide transcriptions themselves in the body or the alt-text field.

    If OPs take my transcriptions and edit it into the body, that’s pretty good too. Especially if more people take up the work so transcriptions get posted on posts that I don’t do myself.

    The algorithm is far too fickle for me to have even considered my comment getting upvoted to the top. Good if it happens I guess, but not in my consideration.



  • Interesting. What client are you using? It displays fine for me in lemmy-ui (the default Lemmy web app).

    I hope this helps rather than being pedantic & annoying?

    Absolutely it does! Unfortunately Lemmy and Piefed clients are…inconsistent, at best, when it comes to how some of the finer points of syntax get parsed. Spoiler text is among the worst contenders, because of how non-standard the syntax is (second-worst contender: superscript & subscript). I’ll try adding in the newlines and hopefully it won’t cause any extra problems, but I can’t guarantee it’ll help.


  • Transcription

    A photo of a man with a grumpy expression in a business shirt and tie gesturing over a table, saying “Could this not have been an email?”

    A second photo showing a wider shot of the same man, now with no expression, as across the table from him sits a police officer holding a clipboard, with a grumpy expression, saying “No”.

    Art by Twonks


  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetomemes@lemmy.worldVolkswagen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago
    Transcription

    A picture of a VW car driving down a motorway with the road and background blurred. It is captioned:

    Golf 7

    From Berlin to Warsaw in one tank.

    Underneath that is the “Awkward Look Monkey Puppet” meme, awkwardly looking towards the camera and then away.




  • Transcription

    The stepping vs jumping on a rake meme, showing a stock image render of a person stepping on a rake and having it smack them in the face on top, and an image of a man doing a skateboard trick with a rake below, also landing on it.

    The man stepping on a rake is captioned “programming for the first time”.

    The man performing a trick with the rake is captioned “programming for the hundredth time”.





  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoFunny@sh.itjust.worksSmooth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago
    Transcription

    Plain black text on a plain white background:

    A girl who caught me looking at her very toned legs in jeans.

    Her: “Whatcha looking at?”

    Me: Sorry your legs look great in those jeans.

    Her: You should see me without them.

    ME: Why would you take off your legs?




  • outlaws anonymous communication by requiring every citizen to verify their age before accessing a service

    This is likely to be the case in practice, but technologically, it does not have to be the case.

    If the age verifiers (which IMO should be the governments themselves[1], but could also be a private third-party, as long as it’s not the same as the social media company) only ever receive a blinded token representing the user, verify the user’s age, and then the user brings that token back to the social media site, unblind it, and present them the signed token, there is no way for the age verifier to track which sites a person visits, and no way for the sites to have any detail about who their users are (other than what they already have).


    1. obviously, it actually shouldn’t be anyone at all: parents should be put in charge of their own kids, and maybe given the tools with robust parental control software to handle it client-side. Government server-side age verification is just not a good option. But if we assume they’re going to do that, we should at least discuss the way it could be done in the least-bad way. ↩︎


  • A friendly reminder that cars are still highly destructive, whether powered by petrol, battery, or hydrogen, and whether driven by a human or automation. The only real environmentally, economically, and socially responsible solution is to drastically reduce the amount of trips made by car, by introducing road diets and modal filters, by having mixed-use medium or higher density zoning, by building high quality safe separated bike paths, and good quality, frequent, affordable public transport.

    Also, keep your pets on your property. If there’s no way to keep them from leaving your yard, keep them inside. It’s better for them (they live longer on average, even if you control for the increased likelihood of getting run over) and for the environment.



  • I’m not sure what “piece linked” you’re talking about, since none of the parent comments of this comment actually have a link in them.

    This is the first time I’ve ever heard of FUTO, but I did read their statement about open source and it sounds pretty good to me. I actually think they’re capitulating a little bit too much by deciding not to call it open source anymore. As far as I’m concerned, if the source is available and anyone can contribute, that’s open source. I don’t particularly care whether or not it’s free for Google to incorporate it into their increasingly-enshitified products or not.

    Creative Commons (an org to which FUTO says they have donated) doesn’t like their licences being used for software, presumably for finicky technical legal reasons. But if you imagine the broad spirit of their licences applying to software, all the main CC licences would be open source in my opinion. All combinations of Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike, and No Derivatives, as well as CC0 respect the important elements of open source.