CANT WAKE UP

As someone who has been thirty years old for the past five years, I resent your disqualifying tone.

Is this about the minimum A press speed runs?

What’s the deal with black people? They’re not black, and they’re not people.

-Jerry Seinfeld (probably)

aislopmukbangarr

Don’t care.

I’ll die on this hill.

Call me stubborn, but I refuse to call a screenshot of a selfie with humourless text a ‘meme’

I’m pretty sure cats don’t choose their sexuality, bigot!

For what its worth, Instagram and twitter screenshots aren’t memes either.

This has nothing to do with whether tiktok is the villain of the week.

Also, I give no shits if I’m at the bottom of some arbitrary list. I’m gonna speak the truth, even if I’m hated for it by dumb shits who think ‘selfie with text’ = ‘meme’

Good meme lol

At least its not a TikTok screenshot

Hurry up and do it lol

you’re right, this isn’t an image macro.

Its not a fucking meme either.

Colloquial definitions are not prescribed.

A TikTok screenshot is just documentation of someone else’s context.

By any modern definition a meme requires some element of remix, juxtaposition, or intentional humor that turns raw content into a cultural shorthand

This isn’t that.

By your definition, a stop sign is a meme. Congrats, you’ve made the modern word useless.

Literally anything that isn’t a fucking tiktok screenshot.

Hey…

Tiktok screenshots aren’t memes.

it can make the people around you uneasy.

I don’t need one, I’ve got that covered, thanks.

If He did, He would be well within His right to.

Translation: God killing babies is fine because God did it.

That’s not morality, that’s raw power worship.

If Hitler had been omnipotent, would you have called his actions “right” too? Because your standard isn’t good vs evil; it’s just strong vs weak.

Basically telling Elisha to go disappear with Elijah.

So the kids didn’t say “kill yourself”, they said “go up like Elijah” Which is mockery, sure, but still not a capital offence.

You’re still defending child-murder-by-bear for playground trash talk. If your morality system equates insults with death, it’s not morality, it’s authoritarian fragility.

An eternity in paradise isn’t a consolation prize. And God didn’t torture Job. Satan did.

Wrong. Job 2:3 literally says God gave Job into Satan’s hand “without reason”. If I hand my kid to a known abuser “as a test”, I’m responsible for everything that follows. Passing the blame to Satan doesn’t make God look better, it makes Him look like an accomplice.

I hope you’d agree that killing unborn children is also wrong.

I’m pro-choice. I don’t believe potential life has more value than the actual lives of the people carrying them.

But here’s the kicker: even by your standard, your God fails. The Flood, the plagues, Old Testament wars; unborn children wiped out en masse. You claim to worship the “sanctity of life” but your own deity is history’s biggest abortionist.

How would you define morality?

Morality = reducing unnecessary suffering and increasing well-being.

By that standard, bears mauling kids, floods drowning babies, and plagues killing firstborns are immoral.

Your definition is “whatever God says” which means if God told you to burn your toddler alive, you’d call it good. That’s not morality, it’s obedience.

The towns so bad that only one decent person lived in them.

Even if you take that at face value, God still torched everyone; children, infants, livestock. Collateral damage doesn’t vanish just because you declare “everyone there was bad”. That’s exactly the justification every human tyrant has ever used.

We do have independent sources for Jesus… Josephus, Didache, Polycarp.

None of those are contemporary.

Josephus was born after Jesus allegedly died, and his passage about Jesus is widely considered tampered with by Christians.

The Didache and Polycarp are Christian writings, believers repeating their own story, not neutral evidence. That’s like Mormons citing Joseph Smith’s buddies as “independent sources”

Also, proving Jesus’ existence doesn’t prove his divinity. I dont care if a person named Jesus lived 2,000 years ago.

And no, your vaccine analogy fails. We have independent, testable, reproducible data for vaccines. If all we had were 26 internally inconsistent pamphlets from believers claiming vaccines worked, we’d laugh them out of the lab.

Your entire defense boils down to this: “God is good because He’s God”. That’s not an argument. That’s an abdication of morality. You’d excuse anything; genocide, torture, infanticide; as long as it had divine branding.

Which means you don’t have a moral compass at all.

You’ve outsourced it to a book that justifies things you’d call evil in any other context.

Actually…

Crypto mining requires high compute throughput.

LLM’s require high VRAM.

Very different objectives and hardware in mind.

They were going to be evil otherwise.

Pre-crime executions of babies? You’re justifying mass infanticide with Minority Report. That’s not morality, that’s thought-policing unborn futures. By that logic, God should’ve killed you before you typed this comment.

They were essentially telling Elisha to kill himself.

They yelled “baldy.” You’re the one rewriting it as “kill yourself” to excuse bears mauling children. Imagine standing in front of a grieving parent and saying “don’t worry, your kid had it coming for making fun of a prophet’s haircut.”

Job is now in heaven.

So torturing someone is fine as long as you reward them later? If I broke your legs today but promised you a PS5 in ten years, would that make me moral? This is abuse with a consolation prize.

If a pig slaughters another pig and eats it, then pigs would find that evil. Yet it’s okay when a human does it.

Wrong twice.

First, might doesn’t make right. If God orders genocide, it’s still genocide. slapping “God” on it doesn’t turn evil into good.

Second, your pig analogy fails with me because I’m vegan. It isn’t okay when humans slaughter pigs. You just admitted your morality boils down to “the strong can do whatever they want to the weak.”

That’s not morality, that’s predation.

That’s because God is God.

Congratulations, you admitted it: divine command theory. If God ordered you to skin your child alive, you’d call it good. That’s not morality, that’s just worshiping raw power.

Oops! You didn’t mention nuking towns

Jericho, Sodom, Gomorrah. Ring a bell? The Bible is full of God wiping out entire cities. Pretending otherwise won’t erase the body count.

Reproducible and testable evidence… Napoleon.

Strawman.

We don’t need to “reproduce” Napoleon, we verify him through multiple independent sources: letters, accounts, artifacts, battlefields. If you have comparable evidence for God, written by neutral parties, corroborated by archaeology, contemporaneous, and consistent, then put it on the table.

Spoiler: you don’t.

All you’ve got is one internally contradictory book written by believers.

Everything you’ve listed are instances of God punishing evil.

• Flooding babies.
• Killing firstborns.
• Sending bears to shred kids for saying “baldy”
• Torturing Job to win a bet.

That’s not “punishing evil”. that’s cosmic tantrums.

If a human did it, you’d call it evil.

You only excuse it because you slap “God” on the front. That’s divine command theory. might makes right. Which isn’t morality, it’s just fear dressed up as worship. Ironically, its the same logic which fascists like Hitler use.

are you suggesting God should let Hitler reign free in heaven?

Strawman. Nobody said “let Hitler into heaven”.

But drowning toddlers and nuking towns isn’t “justice”, it’s indiscriminate slaughter. If God’s only two settings are “do nothing” or “kill everyone” that’s a design flaw, not justice.

Where did DNA come from? Who made biology?

Same tired “who made X” game.

Who made God?

If you say “He always existed”, then congratulations, you just admitted things can exist without being created. Which means biology doesn’t need your sky-dad either.

You made dinner with your creativity. Is it cruel to the dinner that you boil it in your stomach acid?

False analogy.

My dinner isn’t a conscious being. If I invited you over and drowned your kid in my soup “to punish evil” you wouldn’t call it dinner. You’d call the cops.

(Furthermore, I’m vegan, so my meals don’t include anything which is/was a conscious being)

One can prove God exists…

Then do it.

Stop dodging. Show reproducible, testable evidence that distinguishes your God from imagination. Until then, you’re just asserting.

Who designed that process?

Nobody “designed” it. Evolution by natural selection explains complexity from simplicity, no designer required. If you think complexity requires design, explain who designed God, who is infinitely more complex.

Atheists cannot even answer at what point human life begins.

Wrong. Biology is clear: human life is a continuum, not a single magic switch. What’s disputed is when rights should be granted, which is a moral and legal question, not a scientific one. You’re just mixing categories.

Yeah because such a list would be empty

Empty? You’ve clearly never read your own book. Here’s just a taste:

• The Flood – God drowns almost every human, animal, and child on Earth (Genesis 7).

• The Plagues of Egypt – including killing the firstborn of every Egyptian family (Exodus 12:29).

• Ordering Genocide – wiping out the Amalekites, including infants and animals (1 Samuel 15:3).

• Lot’s Wife – turned to salt for the crime of looking back (Genesis 19:26).

• Killing Kids for Mockery – sending bears to maul 42 children for calling Elisha “baldy” (2 Kings 2:23-24).

• Hardening Pharaoh’s Heart – deliberately making him resist so God could “show His power” by killing more people (Exodus 9:12).

• Jephthah’s Daughter – forced human sacrifice of his own child to fulfill a vow to God (Judges 11:30-39).

• David’s Census Punishment – God slaughters 70,000 Israelites because David counted them (2 Samuel 24:15).

• Job’s Torture – God lets Satan kill Job’s children and ruin his life as part of a bet (Job 1-2).

• Eternal Hellfire – condemning billions of people to infinite torture for finite “sins” (Matthew 25:46).

So you drew out the schematics? decided what hair to put where?

No, and neither did God. That’s the point. I provided DNA, biology did the rest. By your logic, I didn’t “make dinner” unless I forged the cutlery and mined the iron for the stove. Dumb standard.

Can you do that?

Can God? Unless you can prove he exists, you’re just putting a holy sticker on a process we understand down to the molecule.

Some people cannot be convinced…

Yeah, flat earthers, climate deniers, anti-vaxxers… and theists.

Here’s the thing though, if I cannot be convinced, whose fault is that?

Because I don’t believe in god that means I’ll go to hell, right?

Why is it that the benchmark for being accepted into heaven is throwing away epistemic and logical foundations?

Why is it fair to throw me to down to hell because those specific qualities are universally valuable EXCEPT for when we use them to evaluate whether its reasonable to believe in God without evidence?

Doesn’t God know the future? Doesn’t God know that every condition that led me to this moment would cause me to reject any answer you’ve got for me?

Doesn’t that mean he set me up to fail?

That is REALLY fucking stupid. Like, literally, definitionally stupid.

Yes, I know what you were referring to, I know how nested comments work.

Now, what I was referring to was:

there’s no evidence for a god which acts like that

Now, you want to claim that God would not kill people for not going to church.

Cool, but even if he DID. It STILL wouldn’t be on the top 10 most fucked up things which HIS OWN BOOK says he did, or has plans to do. Not even including the moral imperative to kill whoever the fuck he wants because ‘he created them’ (what even is this argument…)

But i digress;

God gave you a son.

No, bro, I’m almost certain I was the one who got my partner pregnant.

My partner and I did make our son lol, ive got DNA evidence.

If you want to claim God gave me a son, then you’ll first have to convince me God exists.

Can you do that?