Lemmy shouldn’t have avatars, banners, or bios

  • 0 Posts
  • 105 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle






  • WSL is pretty good these days. Dual boot with Windows is still a pretty risky move with how easily Windows will overwrite your boot loader. I usually recommend you pick one os or the other rather than dual boot, so I’m in favor of WSL or virtualbox. Personally, I have never cared for needing to reboot just to switch operating systems. I tend to stick with one and the second one does nothing but take up disk partition space.

    WSL lets you run both simultaneously without rebooting. Virtualbox lets you do the same with extra setup. Virtualbox makes it easier to do GUI setups than WSL does, and the network configuration is a little more obvious.

    The best option is to get a second machine so you can run both. If that’s not an option, virtualbox is the better choice for learning. If you just want a Linux environment on your existing setup (similar to using a Mac) then WSL is usually good enough



  • It isn’t censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It’s a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble

    Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn’t apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Which you can easily turn off if you don’t browse Lemmy at work.

    Just because you don’t use the tag for its intended purpose doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don’t ruin the tag’s purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it



  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The tag is for warning people browsing at work not to click… Using it to prevent someone from clicking on a post that would be unacceptable to read at the workplace is exactly what it’s for

    It’s not like it’s censorship, it’s just a warning tag.


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What do you think the tag is for?

    People at work don’t (shouldn’t) click on NSFW-tagged content. If it draws your eye even more, then I assume you don’t browse from work.

    How would it defeat the purpose to tag content that most workplaces would not be okay with? If you don’t mind seeing the content, then the tag might entice you. People at work will recognize it and not click


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The NSFW tag is part of the mechanism to curate the feed.

    I’m not sure why people get offended by people wanting to use social media but not wanting to view content that can get them fired. If the content doesn’t bother you, then you shouldn’t filter NSFW content. It’s not like the NSFW tag is censoring the content and preventing you from seeing it if you click it.

    For people with jobs, why not make it easier to filter the things that companies don’t like? It doesn’t affect you any.




  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtoCalvin and Hobbes@lemmy.world2 August 1987
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I usually assumed the “larger than life” giant hills and huge woods were part of the way Calvin looked at the world, rather than the way his parents saw it. After all, he saw his dad as working in a high-rise office, which would be out of place this close to a home like this

    Just the same, it was clearly a great place for an imaginative outdoorsy kid to live.