Moo-ose …

Moo-ose …

Moo-ose Moo-ose MOO-OSE MOO-OSE MOO-OSE MOO-OSE MOO-OO-OSSSE

I’ve been a software developer for over 15 years, I’ve never used one. It’s not necessary at all.

The fact that you think it’s bad at one thing in your list but adequate at the others is part of the problem. It’s bad at all of those things, because it’s a chatbot. Admittedly a very advanced chatbot, but still just a chatbot.

The most important take away here is what of your list was impossible before LLMs? Because the reality is that absolutely everything that you mentioned was possible before LLMs. All that LLMs have added is the chat interface part.

Granted, the technology that allowed LLM’s is likely to be very useful and already has been in places like protein folding, but that happened before LLMs.

You didn’t actually say what you think LLM’s are enhancing. Just that you feel that they are. Honestly I think that’s the biggest part, they’re big shiny things that look like they’re doing a lot. But they actually aren’t. LLMs are chatbots and they will never be anything more than just chatbots.

The number of times that I have been downvoted into oblivion for pointing out that the Internet is not the World Wide Web is too damn high.

I have one and it isn’t that hard to read. The top is still 12 but the bottom is midnight with 6 and 18 in the 9 and 3 place respectively.

Honestly it kinda looks more like a North American Saturn than a Genesis/MegaDrive or Master System. In which case the batarang controller would be slightly more accurate.

There is no model that can be trained in real time currently, and one instance isn’t going to offer anything to the model as far as new training data goes.

I learned far more from my truck driver grandpa and grease monkey uncles than I did from drivers ed or from the instructor who kept doing the opposite of what he told us to do.

Also the human Nabooans are colonists from coruscant, so the gungans might have been forced to live in underwater orbs the humans can’t reach.

Wait, is that actually canon? Lots of other sci-fi franchises have in universe explanations for why there are humans everywhere. In Stargate for instance they were slaves that were taken everywhere in the galaxy. But I didn’t know there was an actual in universe reason in Star Wars.

Well now at least you can say you know of me, I have 4 years left before 40.

Those of us in the second half of millennial aren’t that different than the first half, the biggest difference is things like YouTube and Facebook were high school things for us instead of college things.

A photo shop is what you used to take your film or pictures to to be enlarged or touched up. This process became known as photo-shopping and the software was named after this. This is according to my artist grandma who died recently and my graphic design professor years ago.

Because the software doesn’t understand the concept of anything. It’s been fed a bunch images of keyboards and programmed to output an average of the images. It has no concept of a pattern or a keyboard in which to conform to something recognizable.

Photoshop the software is named after photoshopping and not the other way around.

There is a difference though and one didn’t go away just because the other exists.

I am from a very humid place in parts of the year and I still disagree.

I don’t know anything about tarot cards so I’m not sure I get the joke, but it looks cool.

I remember when Mac OS stopped using animal mascots right after the 90s ended… in 2012.

I also feel that 68° F is still jacket territory.