Needs to be more specific to narrow it down. “Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter (Burton’s wife) make out in this movie”

DENTAL PLAN

I think your best bet is to disable suggesting any contacts from the system settings. The setting is called “Show contacts when sharing content” and will affect all apps. It’s not ideal, but there’s no way I can tell to ignore/dismiss specific contacts from the share menu.

it’s like poetry, it rhymes

FWIW with virus total, you don’t even need to upload the file, just provide the hash to see if is known to virus total. The name may be auto generated which wouldn’t help much in searching, but the hash is based on the file contents.

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

The standard is called TOTP and Google became synonymous with it because they pushed it in the late 2000s for Gmail and have a large user base. Other sites did have systems beforehand, like Paypay which had a dedicated fob, but that was not widely used. Gmail was likely most people’s first experience with MFA and Google pushed their own Authenticator app (and didn’t really advertise that others could be used). As other sites got on board, it was easier to tell people to use the app they use for google to get their code, since you could assume people had the app.

Basically that made a situation where people who had a different TOTP app knew their app would work with “Google Authenticator” but for those without an app or using Google Authenticator, they were likely unaware of the interoperability and standards behind the mechanisms.

I would go into the Outlook app and clear the storage and cache and see if that helps. If you don’t want any contacts to show in the list, you can disable “Show contacts when sharing content” if you search for this in settings.

AKA creepio

Once the victim clicks the link, they are taken to a fake Calendly landing page that presents a CAPTCHA, followed by an AiTM phishing page that attempts to steal visitors’ Google Workspace login sessions.

How is the phishing page able to steal the Google Workspace session? or do they mean it presents a fake login form to get username/password?

This might be a simple goof, but a lot of the layout in The Shining (intentionally) doesn’t make any sense. There’s some great analysis of the insane architecture of the hotel.

Also can make a good case for the imperial troops who don’t blow up the escape pod with C-3P0 and R2-D2 because “there are no life forms”. That small oversight resulted in the downfall of the empire.

They are requiring Plex Pass for all remote sessions, even ones which don’t go through plex servers, where your client connects to your remote plex server directly. IMO, this should not require Plex Pass if the remote stream is not going through Plex’s server.

Also since the April 2025 update where they required the payment, the “new experience” apps have been terrible, and people have been side loading the old apps because they retain core functionality. Maybe there was a technical reason to release new apps to enforce the Plex Pass requirements, but it has been a terrible experience being told to pay money and then getting a worse experience, compared to what was free a year ago.

There’s no audio in this video. From the pinned comment

Hey guys. I bet you are wondering why there is no audio - A-HA blocked the video worldwide yesterday 5-2-22. The only way I could keep this video public is by muting the the Take On Me part which really sucks. This was just a fun, goofy meme from the beginning and I don’t see what they have to gain from blocking it. If they end up unblocking it, I will for sure restore the audio.

Also a remake of a 1960’s classic in the Mad Max universe: It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad Max World.

Sasha Grey, an adult actress who stared in a feature film with Elijah Wood.

I was pleasantly surprised for a Disney+ show. Didn’t think they’d have him shooting the cops in the face. Glad they’re addressing the hypocrisy of real life cops who idolize The Punisher because the symbol looks cool, and don’t understand the character.

Assuming this is in the United States of America, this is not necessarily true based on a recent supreme court case, Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy, the U.S. Supreme:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1078_4gci.pdf

https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2024/05/supreme-court-clarifies-that-copyright-damages-are-not-limited-to-three-years

On May 9, 2024, in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a copyright owner is entitled to monetary relief for timely infringement claims — i.e., claims brought within the Copyright Act’s statute of limitations — no matter when the infringement occurred. This could potentially allow some plaintiffs to claim damages stretching back many years into the past.

The majority “assum[ed] without deciding that a claim is timely under [Section 507(b)] if brought within three years of when the plaintiff discovered an infringement, no matter when the infringement happened.”