Yeah, that’s why I just use LUKS which doesn’t slow my HD almost 50%.

So good they can still use a Linux distribution with LUKS.

Win 11 comes pre-installed with newer computers, which normally has the latest SED mechanism available. Isn’t it? I don’t see the need to overthink how to encrypt data if there is a method that doesn’t slower your disk usage already.

I said nothing about adding more encryption, in fact I said the opposite.

But is what Microsoft is doing here. Most SSD already has hardware level encryption… is what I said on the first comment…

Okay xD go ahead… but encrypting the encrypted makes no sense.

I work with data wiping, and old drives needed to re-write multiple times (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_erasure#Standards). That lowers the hard drive life/health, while SSD just needs to reset the encryption key.

No, try this safing.io, unless you want VPN for mobile which ProtonVPN should be okay, but the Portmaster app has more control over what app is leaking requests.

Well I like this way, makes it easy to understand and read. My IDE has a good SQL editor and I can see it perfectly and well formatted and colored…

Well, it is safe as it’s what APT do… hahaha just make sure to download latest version…

While many SSDs come with hardware-based encryption, which does all the processing directly on the drive, Windows 11 Pro force-enables the software version of BitLocker during installation, without providing a clear way to opt out.

Said by AutoTL;DR

As TWeaK replied to you, 20-40% is too much to say it is viable for daily usage. Most of SSD already has good encryption methods and an easy way to safely wipe data without re-writing each byte. That’s efficiency.

Well, I’m not using systemd and Portmaster (safing.io free open source without the VPN tunnels) has a DNS control over any request your Linux do… I don’t think I have any issues here… hehe

But it’s weird that didn’t happen on the Windows gaming time… 🤔

This is what I mean: https://support.plex.tv/articles/216766168-accessing-a-server-through-relay/ There is no “NAT traversal” if I’m not wrong.

What’s better than thepiratebay?

Isn’t that the same? Who said that?

You mean this? https://support.plex.tv/articles/200289506-remote-access/ Step 2: For automatic configuration, make sure your router supports the “UPnP” or “NAT-PMP” feature

EDIT: This is what I mean: https://support.plex.tv/articles/216766168-accessing-a-server-through-relay/ There is no “NAT traversal” if I’m not wrong.

But then others browsers like Firefox will gain popularity… I am okay whatever they do, I never see any ad or ad-blocker blocker and I doubt I will even see any of those.

The only disadvantage I see is that you need to manually put the TV guide, while Plex has it automatically already. (and you will need this to record Live TV)

Also, Plex can be accessed from outside internet without opening ports on your home router (that’s much safer). While with Jellyfin, if you want to access from outside internet to your home, you will need to open ports (and I don’t recommend it). What I did is to rent a server on a datacenter with like 18T for my stuff, that’s not cheap but that server also has many more services, so it’s compensated. 😛

Find whatever fits better for you.

I don’t know exactly what’s your problem, but I would like you to recommend using Jellyfin https://github.com/jellyfin

I have Plex lifetime plus, but I still prefer using Jellyfin…

I see, not Arch based so much more unique distro. Thanks for sharing.