

No, only in Sweden. And if you look up someone, they will be notified of who did it.


No, only in Sweden. And if you look up someone, they will be notified of who did it.
No can do. It’s just too big. Nobody can do anything about anything because it’s soo big. You can’t phantom the size of USA before you get in a car and drive some hours across the state border only to realize that you’re still in the same car.


Then OP ought to change the second “to” to “will” to avoid confusion.


What if the system you know doesn’t make sense to you?
It’s hidden from view in this picture, but there’s a wider drain pipe in the center.
It makes more sense when you’re comparing month to month development.
If you have a perfectly normal child then it doesn’t matter to measure anything and you can call it whatever.
However if you’re in a maternity group and all the other children started pointing at things at 13 months and yours doesn’t, then it might help to remember that yours was born prematurely and you can expect that behavior at 14 months.
Now, you can convert numbers as much as you please, but this doesn’t make sense as 1.08 and 1.16 years. You can say one year and one month and one year and two months, but it does makes sense for everyone in the conversation if you use the conventional method of communication which is 13 and 14 months. Don’t even get me started on Tiger leaps. Those come on schedule by the week.
It’s convention. If you go to a car mechanic to get new tires, you also don’t ask for “big wheels” if you want a 226/40R19.


No doubt. But why does the farmer get the money? It would make more sense for the government to buy the land back for good.
The normal age to stop using months is 2 years.
That’s because there’s a massive difference between a 12, 18, and 24 months old. It makes sense to have and use different references to separate them.


That’s a nice idea, but it would be better if the farmers hadn’t bought that strip of field to begin with.
Farming is ridiculous like that.
Now the farmers are getting paid your tax euros because they once bought it, destroyed it and took no responsibility for it.


Yes it is. Their entire vendor shit can go to hell. I don’t need a Samsung app-store, Samsung photos, Samsung parental controls etc. on a cheap phone that already has Google’s versions of the same crap. It’s like having 2 operating systems in constant conflict on the same phone, and the only real purpose is for Samsung to collect your data.


If Google actually cared about security they ought to stop Samsung from automatically installing TEMU and Candy Crush in their random “updates”. It installs that shit whether or not you remove the check marks. The “updates” contain no further updates.


If only the procedure was the same for their own store… there’s soo much crappy adware there.


Well, then, why isn’t Kentucky more feminist? It’s about as homogenous as Sweden.


Maybe it’s time to cut ties.
Let the CEO do his business with AI only. Let the developers do their own business without a CEO and without AI.
I’m afraid you’re overqualified. It’s an entry-level job.
Perhaps someone with higher standards like you would be a better fit for our penny-farthing department.
Sure, but it’s difficult to classify which jobs are objectionable and what the price should be for someone to do them anyway.
If they want to pay me to deliver stuff on a unicycle, I’ll be delivering stuff on a unicycle. Do I want to ride a unicycle? Depends on the pay.
Dd you find out what it is?
I’m pretty sure I’ve had or used one before, but I don’t remember where. The top part is for securing a strap or rubber band. As you can see from the wear it’s exposed during use, while the bottom is not. The stick has a shape that could be sown into something. My guess is that it is used to close a bag or securing a tarp to a trailer or the hood for a baby pram/stroller. Something to be used outdoors anyway.


the CEO has said that managers need to prove that AI can’t do a job if they want to increase headcount
This is why it will fail. Instead of the CEO providing any kind of explanation for how AI could work, managers now need to waste their time arguing with the CEO why their stupid ideas won’t work.
I have one manager who does this kind of reverse burden of proof all the time (unrelated to AI), and in the meantime we don’t get anything done of value of to the company.
It’s like trying to push a door that says pull.
Insurance is worse than communism in this case.
Tax paid universal healthcare and healthcare insurance both work on the idea of socializing the cost.
The difference is that insurance companies also need to make a profit too feed the owners. Since they don’t actually produce anything that can make a profit, the only place they can grab the “profit” is by denying cover.
American healthcare insurance is exactly the same picture that is shown when people try to explain why communism doesn’t work.