The drastically recontextualizes all of the “I use Arch BTW” memes. 😂

42 is the sum of 6 x 7 but that isn’t why they say it.

I mean well yeah. The other numbers actually have some kind of meaning 67 is just nothing.

Do not confuse spiritual belief with religion. Religion by its very definition is fanaticism.

The only ones that can call them out on that is congress. And right now Congress is being run by a bunch of boot licking Republicans and spineless Democrats.

I don’t think you understand how much it is that jurors are not allowed to know about jury nullification. If it’s found out that they bring it up in the jury deliberations, or mention or even allude to it during the trial, they can be kicked off the jury immediately.

They basically shifted all the research that they were doing through alpha fold to Isomorphic Labs.

Edit: there’s a case to be made for the idea that they may have wanted to lower the public profile of the work they are doing in order to monetize it. Alpha fold was a non-profit endeavor, and switching it over to isomorphic labs may give them the opportunity to sell their research as a product instead of giving it away for free.

Go capitalism! 😒

Not probably grifting. This is the grift. She is trying to develop a following of religious extremists who believe that if you are not a Jesus freak then you are evil. And there is nothing Jesus freaks love more than cosplaying as an oppressed minority.

You want to know why people feel unsafe with a religious zealot on board an airplane? It’s because in 2001 religious zealots hijacked three planes and murdered thousands of people and terrorize the entire nation.

Fuck religion

Still not an option because jurors are not supposed to know about jury nullification and lawyers are not allowed in any way shape or form to suggest it.

There is in fact a current case in the UK, which is the legal system that the US has based itself on, in regards to a lawyer insinuating jury nullification during their closing remarks. The lawyer is being held in contempt and is now awaiting their own trial for that.

Because it’s a question about the constitutionality of whether or not they were within their rights to violate his.

This is a question for judges.

This is not the kind of case that goes in front of a jury.

I believe they’re citing two different rights in the Bill of Rights. They mention the Fourth amendment which provides against unwarranted search and seizure and then as an addendum they allude to the fifth amendment which provides against self-incrimination.

Do gay people seriously still use this kind of derogatory language in referring to their partners?

Or has this been appropriated by incels to make themselves feel superior?

I knew this was one of the things that they had banned. But I don’t actually know what it means. Or why it was something someone would ban.

I think the point was that if AP had published their “filter” and made it a separate and visible toggle setting in their code, this would have been fine. They didn’t choose that option though and this doubling down on the doubling down is just further proof of their disingenuousness.

Personally, I still find AP’s initial attitude churlish and distasteful. The belief that there should be some kind of divider built into the platform in order to “weed out the toxic elements” goes against everything the Fediverse stands for, which is the diversity of opinion without constraint. It is literally the reason why most of the people who left reddit are here in the first place.

I’m pretty sure that Saturday morning cartoons had been nuked by then. Only holdouts I think were Fox affiliates and Nickelodeon.

What’s the word from “billionaires are job creators” people? Oh, yeah. Their the ones laying everyone off in order to use “AI”.

Star wars silver screen edition. Look it up, it’s out there. It’s like a 25 GB download but you can find it.

Bunch of fans got a hold of original film print of the movie and digitized it. No remastering, just the movie as it was presented in 1977.

It is also speculated by historians that Homer wasn’t just one person but in fact entire industry of people whose job it was to tell stories.