Seeing this I think now it’s more than half the US.

Probably they’ll point at this and say “finally, a politician that does what he promises, I should vote for him next time”

I’m not talking about the technical possibility. Of course you can have multiple video stream, one per participant.

I’m saying that without multicast, it can be more resource intensive than having intermediate servers that can multicast on the application layer.

Is a connection between 3+ people still p2p? Or is there another term for it?

I don’t know how this would work over the internet though.

On a LAN you could use multicast, but I don’t think ISPs support multicast, it seems like it would be an easy way to DoS. But I honestly don’t know.

So, if you can’t multicast, the way to have serverless multi-user video calls would be to have a separate video feed for each receiver, which I can see using more resources than through a server that would replicate the stream to all the receivers. Of course this is dependant on distance, even without multicast it consumes more resources if everyone is in the same LAN.

Slice as chunks is huge. I would prefer an unsafe &[T] as &[T;N], but this can be used for that too.

I’m surprised they at least know they have a problem. I would think these companies would just say “look how the sales numbers haven’t changed, that means that we were correct in doing the AI thing. Without it, sales would be sinking into the ocean!”

I don’t see the use case.

There’s 2 secrets here: the link and the password. And to share it with someone you need to share 2 secrets: the locked link and the password.

Why not use the same method you used to share the password to share the link instead? Without the need for this service.

And how are women pushed out of “man jobs”?

And how are we fixing that?

Is it bosses that aim to have male coworkers turning down women? How is that different than bosses wanting artificially 50/50 turning down men?

Is it not being represented in advertising? How is that different than what happens now. Where most advertising displays just women? Or if there is both a man and a woman, the woman is usually centered in the picture or doing a more important/powerful role.

By “encouraging” women in the workplace, what you see is things being done to men that you complain was done to women.

Arguing that driving a car is mandatory while eating meat is a choice must be the most braindead argument I’ve seen from a vegan.

As long as you call .collect() on it at the end, don’t need to write the entire type as it is a method with a generic parameter, and returns that generic.

The intermediate iterators though, those are hell. Especially if you pass it to a lambda and for some reason rust can’t infer the type.

I once came across a parsing library that did the parsing with basically just the type system. It was absolute hell to debug and build. Types of parsers would be hundreds of characters long. It would take tens of minutes to build a simple parser.

I don’t know much much time it would take to build a complex parser, since it was unable to. it reached the max type generic depth of the rust compiler, and would just refuse to compile.

I believe it was called Chomsky or Chumsky or something like that. Discovering nom was a blessing.

fully qualified type names make any language awful.

Here’s the same example in rust:

let a = std::rc::Rc::new(std::vec::Vec<u8, MyAllocator>::new());

I believe u8 also comes from a module, so it would be something like std::u8::u8, but I’m not sure.

I don’t know typescript. But if that’s the case, this meme doesn’t make much sense.

Who writes the types of variables in a language with type inference unless forced by the compiler?

It’s also valid rust syntax.

But if it were rust, this meme would not make sense, since you would just type let a and type inference would do its thing. Which is much more ergonomic.

JavaScript (Typescript for the type part) and python, the most popular scripting languages, use the same order as PHP.

It’s usually compiled languages that do the other one.

Take into account that in order to make PRs to a repository you don’t have access to, you have to make a fork of the repo. Which means another repo.

Glib us licensed under LGPL. So unless your project is happy with that, it’s as if it didn’t exist. That’s one of the problems of having a small standard library.

When people are told what they can or they can’t do. They are gonna complain about it. Abd they’ll go somewhere else where they don’t tell them what to do

But if you put someone to supervise, they will complain because ACAB or something.

Yes. Some mathematicians think that 0 is natural, others don’t. So “natural number” is ambiguous.

In order to avoid ambiguity, instead of using fancy “N”, you should use fancy “N0” to refer to {0,1,2,3,4,…} and “positive integers” to refer to {1,2,3,4,…}.

In the meantime. This is a valid business model.

Take into account that Spain is in the “wrong” timezone.

Correcting for this, dinner was from 21:00 to 22:00. You got home around 23:00, most restaurants don’t open before 20:00.