palantir enters the chatroom

but…but… lemmy is far too small for such companies paid to post these things to go after. it would cost too much more for them to just type in a few more urls to post to, so it’s ok, there’s none on lemmy.

but…but… reddit is far too big for such companies to go after, they wouldn’t dare. reddit admins/mods would catch it and block the users.

but…but… facebook wouldn’t have such content because meta has so much money they can build like reverse AI that would find it and they’d be able to automatically detect it and remove it.

AI Market needs to go up and up. BUY, slaves.

Sounds like a great first question! Go for it!

Thanks will do all that!

Start now! Install it, get a python environment up and running if you haven’t already, and get that first play-around project working which you work outwards from!

Thanks, I’ll be checking them out! I see there was even a film made of it. It must have been a big thing. Housos looks like it was made on an absolute shoestring budget, but the editing is spot-on and acting is also on point!

You purport to being intelligent so you know what you’re doing with your inflammatory responses of explicitly “opposing the draft for women”.

Oh and yet more insults in your responses. I sense a theme here :(

you sound pissy and project hate in every of your responses and on to everything you perceive to involve a man. I feel sorry for you. However, you’re making up facts that the other communities are “so dominated by men” to appease your distorted perceptions of the world.

I don’t know (I try to ignore such news) but I was just writing in generic terms

And then comes the enshittification, like, ya know, Android.

Most people never create even one world-changing technology, Linus casually created two (Linux + Git).

And don’t downplay that he did swear about Microsoft and Nvidia!

It’s possible to strike nuclear power plants in such ways that on-site staff are at high risk of death but nearby population is not. I’d assume it’s the same for nuclear silos? Or, they didn’t do much damage?

leading to them not seeing a doctor,

Interesting you should mention this because other than more suicides, this is the #1 reason why the average lifespan of men is less - procrastination of serious symptoms which are initial warning signs that become fatal illnesses.

To be fair, ghostbusters 3 was really bad.

Honestly, as a women, so it’s not my opinion that matters, but even that meme/joke/trend that “men are simple creatures”, “keep your belly fully and balls empty and we’re happy” etc, like, is that not demeaning to men?

Your opinion matters as much and you should be publicly challenging such shows - as a woman. Is it demeaning? If you have to ask, the answer is most likely, ‘yes’! Would it be demeaning with shows where women characters are stupid and only good for sex? Would it be demeaning with black characters who shout all the time, eat chicken and watermelon and so on…the abusive stereotypes could continue. What’s disappointing for me are that the actors/actresses who play the roles are setting equality back many years for a quick short-lived buck.

I do find the upvote / downvote count on my question interesting though!

Lol, just like I wrote below earlier, anything where an aggressive woman perceives a man as being in charge, it becomes part of the patriarchy and is a target of ridicule and abuse for such angry women. You bang on about the Garrick club as if you’re pissy because it exists, whilst defending women-only clubs.

The Garrick Club has incredibly powerful members including kings and prime ministers and hundred of members of Parliament. If you cannot see how excluding women from such a club is an issue of patriarchy then you are really not trying very hard to understand anything here.

Or, maybe you can’t accept man-only clubs because you’ve been manipulated into not doing so, but can accept women-only because “omg oppression they need a safe space wah wah”.

Oh dear.

The Catholic church still to this day refuses to ordain any women into the priesthood: men only.

Not my world, but so what? There are also the Roman Catholic Women Priests who felt left out so made up their own story.

Ask a girl in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia if there’s any formal patriarchy when they try to go to school, or drive, or go outside without head to toe covering, or simply go outside unaccompanied by a man.

Again, not my world. But… Have you asked if they want to go to school, drive, go outside, or have you assumed they do? Not being a dick but there are very different opinions generally held by women of different cultures and religions that contrast with others - who’s right? (Historically people die over such issues). Also, beyond what Fox news states, there are schools in middle Eastern countries, some are voluntary. Such issues are very complicated and are not black or white.

In the west there are hundreds of industry bodies, clubs and business societies blah blah blah.

So? "The Garrick Club is a private members’ club in London, founded in 1831 as a club for “actors and men of refinement to meet on equal terms” - you’re whining that a men-only club is not ok, but a women-only club is?

A string of strawman arguments. I think you think your opinions make you look cool though. But it’s ok, hate me for my opinions because you can only accept those that are marketed to you.

This right here. But no one wants to do that because it’s easier to create groups based on existing hatred rather than inclusivity and the people who run such communities do it for the power, not the cause.

The less time we talk about exclusive characteristics to isolate people, the more time we as humans can spend together. But it’s easier to market to and capitalise on smaller groups of excluded people rather than one large mass.

People can disagree with each other but still respect each other.

It’s silly to just claim your community to be inclusive and then invalidate anyone’s experience who feels differently

You mean like the women criticising the “manosphere” because they feel differently?