Too cautious, management wants movement on this, not deliberation. Setup a tiger team and give me an action plan asap.

Don’t forget his child porn image generator, what sort of training data did he use to get that result?

There’s a way to cook a steak called black and blue. It was invented by steel foundry workers.

Basically you take a thiner steak and slap it on a red hot slab of steel for a few seconds each side.

You get a nice outer char mixed with an almost raw center.

Anyway, red hot steel is not something that most people have access to, but I have a few different types of forge, both solid fuel and gas.

That’s the personalized prices. That’s step two.

This one is the digital price tags that let the store manager or corporate office instantly raise prices throughout the store for everyone.

What it sounds like is the data centers are using untreated river water, and then are wanting to put that untreated (and now hot) water back.

This is better than using municipal water, which goes through expensive treatment to make it safe to drink.

Putting data centers in space is a good way to keep people from destroying them. Thermodynamics on the other hand, will have a field day with them.

Trump and Hegseth tried two different things simultaneously. They tried to deem Anthropic both a hostile actor, which would cut all DoD contracts off completely, and then also tried to declare them essential and force them to ignore the safety limits set forth in the contract, which is the supply chain thing.

So yeah, the incompetence is showing as it always is.

I don’t know about OP’s take on it. But it is an issue to pay attention to. If you have the spare attention.

Web click through cookie banners, the sites often have ridiculous shit in the terms of service, and by accepting cookies, you are often forced to accept everything.

It’s all mostly unenforceable, but it’s still there.

I don’t know about OP’s take on it. But it is an issue to pay attention to. If you have the spare attention.

And then the AI will just make up the discounts and coupon codes. What you really want is a simple, tuned search engine, like we’ve had for 30 years. Not generated content.

Reprap currently only prints in plastic. You need metal capability, which can be done but is harder to build. And then you need whatever newly patented tech was used here, which should be available for use in about 20 years.

There’s a pill that just finished phase 1 trials that can cure osteoarthritis.

Well, it’s a treatment that allows joint cartilage to regrow and heal properly.

It also reverses age related muscle loss.

Now, these things can come back, but they need to degrade naturally again. Probably. We don’t know how fast the degradation will set in once the suppression of the gerozyme is removed.

If you want to learn more, look up 15-PGDH inhibitors. I’d link to the Stanford study, but that’s a bit hard from my phone.

As someone who has arthritic knees, I’ve been following the various clinical trials closely.

I think it might. But that was years ago.

Did you not live in the world before owning a tiny piece of it?

This same land ownership argument was made in the 1640s, and then again in the 1770s, all to limit the rights of poor people in favor of the rich landlords.

The rich assholes won the English civil wars, mostly because the opposition didn’t know what the hell they wanted or how to get it. And then Oliver Cromwell died without preparing any sort of successor.

The new American government, having eventually learned its lesson, quickly abandoned the land ownership requirements for voting because it never made any god damn sense in the first place, and was just a way to keep poor people down, and the poor had just learned how to wage a war on absentee landlords.

Automation won’t do it right. And that’s the goal.

Besides, Wikipedia has always been human written for humans. Or at least, that too is the goal.

Altering the content of the archive certainly is different. And is undeniably worse.

A note to that, Thiel always says it’s someone who expresses empathy, compassion, or other similar sentiment.

https://www.reinhartlaw.com/news-insights/only-humans-can-be-authors-of-copyrightable-works

https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf

A human must be involved in the creation. A human can combine non-human created things to make something new, but the human must be involved, and the non-human created elements likely lack protection themselves.

The law is very clear that non-human generated content cannot hold copyright.

That monkey that took a picture of itself is a famous example.

But yes, the OP is missing some context. If a human was involved, say in editing the code, then that edited code can be subject to copyright. The unedited code likely cannot.

Human written code cannot be stripped of copyright protection regardless of how much AI garbage you shove in.

Still, all of this is meaningless until a few court cases happen.

The software itself wasn’t compromised. But the download link was. So if you downloaded it in the last year, you downloaded state sponsored malware.