Some ai tdlr The document appears to be a comprehensive research dossier on J.D. Vance, dated February 23, 2024, and labeled as “Privileged & Confidential.” It includes detailed background on Vance’s political career, financial records, personal history, and potential vulnerabilities. Below is a summary of key sections:
Executive Synopsis and Vulnerabilities:
Top Hits:
Campaign Finance:
Policy and Controversial Views:
Personal Information:
This summary highlights Vance’s evolving political positions, campaign finance details, and areas of potential vulnerability that could be used by opponents in future political contests.
Red flags 🚩🚩🚩
Years of “Performance Management” (PM) reviews cited in the lawsuit show Barnett was frequently being scolded for documenting issues on paper and in emails, and even, it seems, being too “knowledgeable.” In a July 2014 PM, cited in the lawsuit, a senior quality manager allegedly wrote, “John is very knowledgeable almost to a fault.” This “knowledge,” the manager wrote, “gets in the way at times when issues arise. John likes to be right and at times rechallenges issues that appear to [be] resolved at a round table.” In the same review, under the heading “Delivers Results,” Barnett, who prior to being transferred to South Carolina only received perfect scores, had received a 2 out of 5 score. This “Opportunity for Improvement” was because of his habit of documenting issues in writing. The PM noted that “John still needs to learn the art of F2F (‘face to face’) engagement to address and follow up on issues instead of using e-mail to express process violations.”
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Reference season 2 episode 3 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xuxO6CZptck
@[email protected] draw me an cyberpunk bard.
Yeah that is a huge number
Remind me of flappy bird in finder: https://eieio.games/nonsense/game-11-flappy-bird-finder/
It’s because of the implication
Primary sauce and discussion too for context. I added the link in comment to the direct map
deleted by creator