Da Bald Eagul

Didn’t know they released a 17" version:p

I’ve said “What? Huh?” out loud at least three times after reading this post.

All I want is a Vivaldi based on Firefox

Ah that’d make sense

Interesting that that works haha. In the end it’s still connecting to a USB C port.

AMD Ryzen 7000 vs 9000 isn’t a huge difference iirc, mostly more efficient. The X3D variants are definitely worth it for gaming performance though, so I’d wait for the 9000 X3D reviews to compare.

32GBs is plenty of RAM for now, 64GB is overkill for gaming purposes. I don’t use 100% of my RAM ever and that’s with Discord and a bunch of browser tabs open while playing Cyberpunk or heavily modded Minecraft.

For the GPU, I currently use a 7900 XTX and haven’t had issues running that with Manjaro Linux. Haven’t used an Nvidia GPU with Linux, but from what I can tell their support was/is dubious but improving.

Global keyboard shortcuts are pretty nice. E.g. muting yourself without alt tabbing to your browser.

How the fuck is this a meme

Okay Ryan George

Seems like an overblown statement, they just shaved their head :(

Wouldn’t that just be a fertility rate below 1?

Rate of 2: 2 babies are born per human death, population grows

Rate of 1: 1 baby is born per death, population remains the same

Rate of 0.5: 1 baby is born for every 2 deaths, pop. decreases.

Rate of 0: no babies are born, but people still die.

What would a negative fertility rate mean? A rate of -1? I don’t think it could exist.

Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be “in space”, not the minimum height for achieving orbit.

That doesn’t really mean anything. You could achieve an orbit at a lower altitude if you wanted to, it would decay faster, but you could do it. The 100km karman line is an arbitrary thing, there is no solid line where on one side you can orbit and on the other side you can’t.

I agree; the comment I was replying to seemed to imply that there was a minimum height requirement, or height by itself equaled orbit. But that’s just my interpretation of it.

Well this seems like a bad semantic argument to me.

Maybe it is, but personally I prefer to see the result 100% finished. I am very impressed by the booster catch, and the non-stop camera feed on Starship was awesome, but I would like to see a full mission before saying that they reached orbit. And to me, demonstrating capability usually means doing it.

So what you’re saying is that SpaceX deliberatly doesn’t let Starship orbit, to keep reentry predictable. Which is what [email protected] said; they don’t actually orbit.

Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be “in space”, not the minimum height for achieving orbit.

Finally, I disagree with the note that having “enough fuel” to reach orbit means they have demonstrated such capability; I believe they easily could achieve this, but they haven’t actually demonstrated it yet.

Based

All the pop ups to pwetty pwease upgrade?? And Office 365 saving to it as the default, rather than to local storage.

I don’t think I’ve seen any Tesla release coverage that doesn’t talk about panel gaps, fit & finish, and at least 1 leaky car. And let’s not start with the Cybertruck…

Google Asia released a video about a physical Gboard product which made me remember it is basically the equivalent of April 1st there. But on the other hand, Nintendo released this on the Dutch language channel too, so I don’t know if this is real or not anymore…

Twitter wasn’t profitable right? So most of the “value” is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.

He tried to back out, I don’t think any of this was about anything. He’s just a dick with a weird sense of humor.

It could be, but I imagine the reported capabilities would be limited by the connected devices. So if your phone doesn’t support USB SuperSpeed 80gbit/s, it wouldn’t be detected by the app.