To be fair in the other direction. Debian and Ubuntu and forks have it. They handle pretty much all filesystems fine, which is indeed impressive. Suprisingly Windows also has pretty good EXT drivers, so in a way the world is in harmony :D .

Hang on there is a sync option? Does that make the progressbar work? If so why is it not enabled?

This is funny, because copying files to a USB flashdrive, is just inherently disfunctional in linux.

Yeah logitech I can see.

Technically this is true. Practically my intellimouse 1.0, and sidewinder x8 still work perfectly.

You probably can. The issue is that most bt headsets mount themselves as a pair of stereo headphones, and a handsfree kit. And for some weird reason Teams will ONLY EVER broadcast audio to the handsfree kit. If you change the volume control to the handsfree kit, blam, you can change the volume.

Well it quite literally says it in its name that it is fucking mint, why wouldn’t you run it

Fuck HTML! Trace an RTF on paper :D

More relevantly SOME people can be discriminated just based on where they were born, and it is perfectly fine, since they are white and european…

But he is right though. If Nintendo really wants it gone they’ll just pull a sony-bleem. As long as there is no real regulation for this stuff, there is not much you can do.

50? Idk the biggest techbro firms NEVER made any money ever. Fucking Spotify is yet to be profitable. Who exactly are they planning to sell more service to?

50 is generous.

The truth is, faceless datacenters run linux. PEOPLE run Windows.

No they don’t. Microsoft makes software. Outsourcing making software makes no sense.

When companies fight regulations they use statements THIS unreasonable to fight better legislation, for framing everyone who supports better regulation, as completely unreasonable whining anti capitalistic bigots, who just want regulation that makes conducting any business basically impossible.

With this logic, if your DVD rots, does the company who originally released the DVD owe you a full refund plus interest?

Well yeah but that is hosted on various abandonware sites. If they defacto disown the rights of it, that is fair enough…

They will ALMOST CERTAINLY. But my point is this doesn’t really help… Let’s say a game I really like, I dunno Wreckfest (substitute you own idc) gets yanked from Steam. Here is my 24.99 EUR back. Okay fine, fair enough (it isn’t but whatever), where can I buy the game again? Well REALLY you can’t, you can either buy gamepass forever (Until it gets yanked from there again), or you can go and hunt down a rare an expensive Xbox physical release.

So have I been reimbursed for my loss? No, because the 24.99 is no substitute for the game I had and wanted.

This is what I wrote on the other thread about the same article. The question is, on what possible grounds are they allowed to revoke licenses for completed sales?

To be fair, Sony might go for that. This is incredibly embarrassing for them as well, and it does erode the trust in their service which is really important for a marketplace like this. Sony will be handing out coupons probably, but this is still damage to their brand.

I think when this happens you DO get a refund, (usually a coupon for the same service, but still). This is a situation where villanizing Sony would be, but not necessarily correct. Obviously they have no interest to remove previously purchased content from user libraries. (like this).

So the question is, on what possible grounds can a company change licensing AFTER sales have been made. This is the same fucking mess as with the soundtrack being retroactively removed from GTAIV. How is this legal?

From the standpoint of linux that is true.