TiddlyWiki was infact an inspiration for Obsidian when it just started

Yeah me too, that clearly explains our “success” with women

if your coworker shared smt or you see smt online that made you chuckle, it’s good enough to repost it on lemmy. Dont’ overthink it

Touche, I get your point, indeed there’s a lot of tech supporty posts however narrowing the community is only good when it has enough content

How about we wait out on fragmentation for flagship community of the instance until it starts to get at least 5 posts/day (30 posts/week)?

For lurkers hoarding high quality content for this community, this is your sign to press the button “New post”

The number of times I got asked if import/export can be used instead of sync

Forbidden loofah

Love the label SMART SOLUTION

And when it doesn’t work, they ram it HARDER

and then people wonder how porn stereotypes can be harmful

alt text is added, cheers

a tech illiterate old friend of mine in his 60s got tasked with changing his simcard for new one. But the network just didn’t appear. Long story short after 3 hrs of headbashing I asked him to send me the photo of simcard itself

that was a valuable afternoon for my humility

alt text: nano-simcard rotated 90 degrees forcefully inserted into standard size simcard frame which is missing micro size simcard frame

note the right side of simcard frame bulging out

I enjoyed this vid and as a contribution I’ll spare y’all loading 20 MB of youtube JS

In the future, if you plan to add sync, consider reimplementing Joplin sync algorithm

That would give you tens of thousands of passionate users, dedicated FOSS server as well as webdav/s3/dropbox/onedrive client sync ability, webclipper and a lot of support to navigate future issues/roadmap

If you ever decide to do that, there’s even a plan to repackage the algorithm as a standalone library

I’ll just leave here the response from obsidian. If you can extract truthful reason from this corp double speak, please share

https://tenebrousdragon.com/Essays/FOSS+and+Obsidian

deleted by creator

Would be interested in more detailed followup about the search. Anything in particular stands out?

Project: Joplin joplinapp.org [email protected]

What it does right: Focus on user experience by aligning aims of product with aim of users.

Everything it does is foss, however its main revenue achieving product (cloud sync target) is focused on convenience rather than vendor lock-in. So it incentivizes the project to cater to its users.

What’s so unique about it: due to lack of monetary incentive a lot of oss projects simply forget about the user and serve mostly to themselves. They fail to listen to feedback because listening to feedback means loss of resources rather than gaining them. As a result many critical bugs are unfixed for decades and UI is so dated no new users want to use the product.

TLDR: don’t forget to create revenue generating module along with the main foss product

Folks, can we simply uncheck option “[x] Show Bot Accounts” in new user profiles by default? (same as with “[x] Show NSFW”)

Firstly, I totally understand people who find reposts annoying and I have blocked few of those because they’re simply irrelevant to me

lemmit online / hackernews reposts

• those help drive inspiration for post making: I can snatch best ideas and post my own version on lemmy
  It’s especially helpful when you’re maintaining inactive community where you’re the only poster – since inactive subs are seen as dead ones.
• not my use case, but I see those instances as ability to combat FOMO for the users who just switched over to lemmy and getting used to its quirks. No need to snoop to reddit if its content is in your feed either way
  • mastodon got almost a dozen of such repost instances from twitter and it’s enormous bonus in transition from birdsite
• if you see lemmit online posts then someone on your instance wants this content/subscribed to it – it doesn’t appear out of nowhere

QoL bots

• tldr bots are generally helpful for long reads\vids and I wish they would be available as option on post creation page
• bots for linking to invidious instances / archive.ph nonpaywalled articles: just saves time

P.S. as a bonus here’s a page about bots that wikipedia uses to streamline and automate work Wikipedia bots - Wikipedia

User of those bots here:

I think this whole problem stems from the lack of tools to configure bot experience. On mastodon, for example, bots can post “unlisted” posts – which don’t show up in the main feed. Only subscribed people receive their posts. On Lemmy there’s no such privacy toggle and admins are forced to shoot a fly with cruise missiles – by defederating instances

I’d understand if you folks decide to defederate from bot instances however I’d urge you to escalate this discussion upstream to LemmyNet github for following features

• post privacy i.e. intended reach
• moderation tools to handle bots activity en masse

This would be far more lasting impact on quality of global fediverse feed and efficient use of admins’ time IMO