

Did he still call you?
If so, I guess that just means you were important enough that he had your number memorized.


Did he still call you?
If so, I guess that just means you were important enough that he had your number memorized.


If by “complicates… basic PC ownership” they mean “infringes on your property rights as a computer owner,” then they’re finally catching on to what I’ve been saying for damn near a decade.
You should not accept having an abusive relationship with your operating system, and that’s what Windows has been since at least 8 (when they started infecting it with “telemetry”), if not earlier. Have some goddamn self-respect, people! Kick Microsoft to the curb!
Huh, I guess the person who runs FFmpeg’s Xitter account must live in western Europe (UTC+1:00).


If I admitted to calling, I would be confirming that the phone number the guy’s office received a call from was linked to this Lemmy account.
As it is, who knows who might have called? The call (or ideally, the calls, plural) could’ve come from any number of people who read that message.


Somebody tell this guy about Mastodon.
The phone number for his executive assistant is 617-349-4280.
https://www.cambridgema.gov/Departments/citycouncil/members/jivansobrinhowheeler


Upon further reflection, I think my previous comment may have been a little too harsh on it.
But I still think that, to be truly “excellent,” it could’ve made its point without muddying/confusing the definition of enshittification.
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks!


It’s not that “excellent.” It’s just ‘for the evulz’ mustache-twirling comical villainy, which ends up downplaying what’s actually important to know about enshittification, which is how self-serving and abusive it is. When companies enshittify products and services, they’re not just making them worse; they’re specifically making them more exploitative.
A lot of the examples shown in the video – cutting holes in socks, sawing off a chair leg so it wobbles, drying out a marker, etc. – are not enshittification. Enshittification is stuff like putting spyware in devices so that you double-dip on the purchase price and the value of the data, or turning products (as opposed to services) into a subscription. Stuff that extracts unearned value from the customer.
It touches on it in the latter part of the video, but for the most part misses the mark.
I’ve always found it interesting/weird how bikepacking seems to have a different ‘style’ than touring or utility cycling. Like using an overgrown seatpost bag instead of a rear rack and panniers, for example. I guess maybe it saves weight(?) and that could be important if your bikepacking route involves hilly singletrack or something, but otherwise I feel like the more traditional ways of handling cargo are more versatile.
Turn that metal grating into a front rack/basket.


No, nobody should.
If you get my meaning.


Lots of unreasonable devs out there.


Running up medical debt, declaring bankruptcy, and expecting the inflated costs being charged by the insurance system to just sort of absorb it is entirely different from the government having public welfare programs!
You do see how it’s different, right?!


I mean, resources aren’t being spent on public welfare programs in the US either. We only have a higher standard of living because of the legacy of (roughly) the New Deal era, when we were investing in it as well as unions winning a lot of labor reforms. Those preexisting advantages have only been slowly eroding for the last 40-odd years.


By definition, no. Legitimate women’s healthcare providers don’t call themselves “crisis pregnancy centers.” Instead, they use other labels, ranging from “family planning” to “abortion clinic.”
Can’t do that anymore with the new ones, AFAIK.


That’s not enough. Just like with systemd, you will be made to care about what the corporatist Microsoft-garglers at Red Hat do, whether you use it or not.
I wanted to upgrade my kids from Pi 4s to Pi 5s, but ended up just getting NUCs instead.