Somehow, we manage to have the problem of assholes like this racking up dozens upon dozens of priors with (obviously) ineffective punishment and would-be productive citizens languishing with long prison sentences for trivial offenses at the same time.
“Fun” fact: MLK championed civil rights for black people for damn near two decades. But once he pivoted to directly addressing the issue of class, he was killed within four months.
Public announcement of the Poor People’s Campaign: December 4, 1967
Assassination: March 29, 1968
I feel like even back then, this was a Windows problem I was too Linux to understand.
I have literally never had a problem opening a .webp. By the time my browser started downloading in that format, all my other software (Dolphin, Gwenview, GIMP, etc.) already supported it too.
More like “vice signaling.”
I mean, it ain’t exactly The Honeymooners or Dukes of Hazzard, is it? That’s the standard that we’re measuring “woke” against these days!
So basically, both esync and fsync are enabled by default for almost everybody.
What are the kernel requirements? Is it something any random Debian user is likely to have, or do you need to be compiling it yourself?
Star Trek X was Nemesis, but who’s counting?
Never mind; I just checked the release dates: the 10th Star Trek movie was actually Galaxy Quest.
It was the first season (and only 10 episodes in, at that, because TV production is stupid these days).
Imagine if you could only judge, say, TNG on the first 10 episodes.
Looking at the downvotes, I don’t think anybody realized you meant “abandon Xitter,” not “abandon using their platform for the greater good.”
Welp, so much for OpenWRT on cheap devices designed for routing (even though flashing the firmware to install it probably got rid of any backdoors anyway); now we’ll have to resort to OPNSense on overkill PC hardware.
I don’t have much tolerance for capsaicin, but I’m all about the isothiocyanate (the pungent compound in wasabi/horseradish/Chinese mustard/etc., and yes I had to look it up for this comment).
You need to do a Ron Swanson-style “I said I want all of the chilis you have” routine.
Yeah, we could have had a nice conversation, if you had ended your initial reply to me a sentence earlier. But you didn’t, did you? No, instead, you tried to turn your failure to say what you meant around on me as if it were my fault, in an attempt to save face at my expense. Did you really think you weren’t going to get called out on it?
There is only one person “failing to engage in an even remotely constructive way,” and that’s you, not me.
I did respond to the point, in my initial comment. Your lack of reading comprehension (and dishonesty!) is your own problem, not mine.
You weren’t “clarifying;” you were backtracking and lying about it. That’s a detail that matters.
First of all, it’s not my list. Check the usernames of the comments you’re replying to.
Second, you didn’t make any sort of distinction limiting which ones you were talking about before, which means that you expressed that none of them were relevant. You don’t get to move the goalposts and then pretend it doesn’t address your point because of that.
Third, that sloppiness and failure to pay attention is only reinforcing my initial impression.
Am I the only one who thinks that a change.org petition would be way less effective than a TOS-style actual-paper-letter-writing campaign?
If you’ve been working as a software engineer for years and things like error handling and data structures (let alone git and testing!) are not relevant to you, I fear for your employer’s codebase.
How the Hell is any of that supposed to “improve” security? Something is fishy here.