Start using the detail tab only and kill the actual image name. It will always kill it immediately. The first tab is a joke in task manager. In the ultra rare case it doesn’t for some really really crazy reason, tasklist / task kill by name or pid
Start using the detail tab only and kill the actual image name. It will always kill it immediately. The first tab is a joke in task manager. In the ultra rare case it doesn’t for some really really crazy reason, tasklist / task kill by name or pid
I think you are failing to understand the design / curvature / multiple radius features of the exit point and that the flange style literally cannot form any remotely close to passable seal to do its job. Idk what to tell you but your not right no matter how you think you can phrase it.
Literally don’t give a shit what you say. I am not wrong. On this specific toilet, the flange style literally doesn’t seal and CANNOT perform a push / pull to unclog a drain due to the exit profile and shaping.
You are not right no matter how smart you think you are.
I am not wrong. There are toilet designs where the flange style literally doesn’t cover the exit chute. I have one. I have to use a “sink” style type. The flange style is small and does not form any type of seal due to the shape and size. It’s literally impossible that it is the correct solution. Everything I said is 100% correct.
This is wrong. Some toilets use the normal “sink” plunger because the exit opening is too large for the “toilet” marked style. You get either or whatever fits your toilet. It’s not specifically for sink only.
From the movie the jerk. It’s his dogs name
Oh ok, thought that was a standard thing. My bad
Don’t android phones have 2 esims?
Yes because having a user remember to do something is a great line of defense, better than encrypting it from the get go. It should just be encrypted in the file.
Am I the only one in this thread that took this as it’s asking for a clear text credential which is a terrible idea?
Neither did the meme creator
Not really at all. I believe your view is wrong. Just because you believe your high level of intellect makes it impossible for you, you may be forgetting the legion of morons and old people out there driving. Is 100% entirely possible someone could be turning a corner and accidentally does something to cause a distraction and run someone over because they instantly look down away from the road.
Regardless of the persons intelligence, it absolutely can and almost guaranteed has happened numerous times over humans driving careers. The button style just makes these situations easier to take place.
Edit - this isn’t a hit piece on EVs, touch capacitive controls suck in general in cars. Physical buttons are always better, easier to press and locate, and do what you need without drawing your attention from driving.
I mean they literally were talking about multiple ways. Someone could hit a stereo control and spike volume while turning the wheel which causes a huge break in concentration leading to an accident. That is absolutely possible and could be extremely dangerous in the right situation.
Love these games, I still play this. Don’t have a steam deck but awesome non the less
I beg to differ not with that attitude. In most situations you can non permanently get a camera out a window or door without harming anything / risking deposit loss. Only where you have no windows near exit points and a windowless door. But even then you can still atleast have something internal to catch a break in (wired streaming to web).
Trade for Starbucks
You’re right they do. But just to clarify the difference based on what the poster was asking
That was a joke, that segment isn’t something to be famous by for real
Hw transcoding requires paid version? Thought this was in the free one all along
Edit oh nvm, I found it on the website. Welp guess I’m buying it