One of the strengths of the too-many-approvals approach was that it made sure developers were still looking closely at every little change.

More likely it made developers immune to the approval button, instead just clicking approve blindly.

I would say: Learn to use LLMs as a tool rather than a crutch.

has shown 100 percent efficacy in early trials

I am always suspicious of any vaccine showing 100% efficacy.

I’ve never seen it recommend a solution using regex. And I’ve had it provide a lot of useful code. Perhaps you need to look into prompt engineering training?

Try reading the question again, this time answer without hating all things LLM. OP asked if AI could be used for initial peer review, to which the answer is a big yes.

As a European, I am surprised at just how much Trump is allowed to do. In the sense that he’s not being stopped by a riot or something like that.

How a lot of software development ends up in real life too.

Sounds like what unions are for.

Which is a rounding error in any commercial business.

deleted by creator

That is your opinion. I sometimes prefer a video over a long text. Everyone has their own preference.

Phoenix Project and Unicorn Project are about non technical skills. Very entertaining books as well.

Except book #2 I fully agree, these are great books to read for someone who wants to grow their non technical skills.

Having worked in this industry for going on 25 years, I long ago learned that there are way too many incompetent programmers in the world working critical jobs. It’s best not to think about it.

Did you even read the article? It literally states that this is cheap and abundant.

Extremely click bait title by the article author.

As someone who doesn’t know much about astronomy, what is interesting about this discovery?

Thank you. I’m surprised, this is the science community and I’m downvoted for asking for a source. I thought this community valued proof.

Source?

They will offer it as an optional service and charge you for it. So yes they use it.