The lie made into the rule of the world.
Don’t trust and never verify for ignorance is happiness.
Especially in Java, it relies extremely heavy on the IDE, to make sense to me.
If you’re minimalist, like me, and prefer text editor to be seperate from linter, compiler, linker, it’s not pheasable. Because everything is so verbose, spread out, coupled based on convention.
So when I do work in Java, I reluctantly bring out Eclipse. It just doesn’t make any sense without.
Can I bring my own AbstractSingletonBeanFactoryManager? Perhaps through some at runtime dependency injection? Is there a RuntimePluginDiscoveryAndInjectorInterface I can implement for my AbstractSingletonBeanFactoryManager?
Yes OOP and all the patterns are more than often bullshit. Java is especially well known for that. “Enterprise Java” is a well known meme.
The patterns and principles aren’t useless. It’s just that in practice most of the time they’re used as hammers even when there’s no nail in sight.
Doesn’t have to be SQL. But most of the time that quote refers to a relational database.
Nowadays there are graphical tools that are alright, such that you don’t have to learn a query language. For example (1), (2) or more commercial (3).
But what’s still important is doing good relational database design. Learning to look at the world as entities and relationships between them. Constraints, keys, indices. There’s books and courses on that. While you’re at that, you’ll probably learn SQL along the way, as it’s so convenient.
Still hard to believe this all happened less than 100 years ago.
Looking at the world today, I don’t find it that hard to believe. Antisemitism being more casual and popular than ever in my lifetime.
Even when it’s reverse? grants being conditional on DEI action has been a long time thing already
if a tool exists which can easily and reliably detect AI generated content then they’d just be using that tool for their training
Generative Adversarial Networks are an example of that idea in action.
One of these projects might be of interest to you:
Do note that CPU inference is quite a lot slower than GPU or the well known SAAS providers. I currently like the quantized deepseek models as the best balance between quality of replies and inference time when not using GPU.
Boiling the frog 👍
I have: here’s the relevant paragraph from the directive:
Amendment 186 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Disseminating pornographic content online without putting in place robust and effective age verification tools to effectively prevent children from accessing pornographic content online shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year.
Pinky promise is explicitely not allowed.
And you’re doing the exact thing: blaming the specific implementation 🙂 It’s so sad that that still tricks people. Is this your first time learning how a EU directive works?
No, it’s saying that exact thing: online users of porn must be deanonymised on penalty of prison. To stop child abuse because that’s related somehow?
It’s just that the countries themselves must choose the particulates: who will do the deanonymisation, in what way, what will enforcement look like, etc.
That’s what they mean with “the final shape of the law hasn’t been determined yet”.
Every EU directive works that way: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_(European_Union)
A directive is a legal act of the European Union[1] that requires member states to achieve particular goals without dictating how the member states achieve those goals
In this case: the de-anonymisation must happen. Up to the respective countries to do the dirty work.
When people, rightfully, get angry the local politician will say “we had to because EU”. And the EU will say “well we didn’t say it had to be in that way, it’s your local politician that did that.”
That’s simply how any EU directive works: EU decides what must happen, and it’s up to the individual countries to put it into their respective laws.
That way people get angry at their federal government instead. Who can point their finger higher up. Who can then point to the countries specific implementation in their turn. It’s a neat trick. Nobody’s responsible for anything.
the law works against its intentions
When has that ever stopped a puritan?
it’s not like you will test significantly different now compared to a year ago.
It does. Simple but important things like sleep impact it hard.
I’ve had it assessed three times in a clinical context, and lowest was almost 10 points different than highest.
That’s a false dichotomy. Freedom of speech should not solely be for those you a priori agree with. That’s how autocrats motivate their supression: it’s always for the greater good, of which they’re the arbiter.
I once ate a hamburger from burger king made by employee that said the n-word when he was 17! I’m a literal nazi!
It’s not a death penalty if you don’t have a trial - Russia
Dude’s got both mommy and daddy issues
Haha because mirror I get it nice 1 dad
I think Ray Dalio’s take on it is correct. It’s a consequence of currency devaluation, as people in general vote against the decrease in spending necessary to deflate the asset bubble. (1)