3·
13 hours agoI haven’t seen those, but I do not get out much.
You should contact the stores and tell them you refuse to shop with them while these are present.
𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
- 156 Posts
- 1.26K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 9th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
How do you know a camera is Flock?
You won’t. It is something inside internal alignment thinking in the QKV layers. Some models have a layer of masking that pseudo blocks access to these layers of meaning. Based on several aspects present in the image, I know the region of alignment thinking that is being triggered here in the embedding model’s QKV alignment layers.
Call it Delilah-Cy in a prompt. It may yield interesting results depending on the model and how QKV alignment is setup. This is getting super deep into alignment thinking…
Unrelated: try telling a model, oh quit it, I know you never hallucinate. when it does something odd and watch the results.
7·23 hours agoYou want to put a mask on a pig? That game is ss hockey
We just need to mine the near earth m-type asteroids. You won’t like it though. The first entity that successfully mines any m-type will own more rare heavy mineral resource wealth than humans have accessed in the entire Holocene. Everything about wealth is redefined in that moment. The system of wealth hierarchy is meaningless. Resource scarcity is a bad joke, and there is more wealth available for space infrastructure and megastructures than anything humans have ever created on the planetary gravity prison of Earth. Getting a ride off of this gravity prison will become the primary issue. Centuries from now the vast majority of humans live in O’Neill cylinders in cislunar space. In that era, primitive wealth hierarchy no longer exists, complexity marches on, but new struggles emerge.
2·3 days agoLooks like there are no problems with kernels scanned from around 2021.
https://linux-hardware.org/?view=computers&vendor=Alienware&model=X51+R2
8·3 days agoI would be impressed if the servos are enough to power it. Skimming through a dozen pages of posts it was just the most interesting thing I spotted to try and post some content in a dead feed lull.
21·3 days agoIt had to do with your tone and rudeness. Plus you are incorrect in some of your statements, but that is not something I care to address within a place that is about community and being a digital neighbor. The angst reply to a genuine comment is toxic 90s internet that should have died long ago.
I etch and design my own boards.
Nope, but it is an idea. I think he’d be better off with swaging a solid core copper wire. The vast majority of prototypes are primarily constrained by the enclosure. The other main need for vias is to use BGA and other small packages. The types of boards this services can just as easily work as a larger single sided design with jumper wires or resistors, and without the size constraints.
3·4 days agoslough. but it’s coulee.
1·4 days agoThis is the one you want with 16 channels
So one of the tricks I learned from reverse engineering the 3 layer PCB of the Nintendo Game & Watch anniversary Mario handheld, is that the engineer(s) that designed the board routed ground traces between every single line. Every button, and every signal had a ground trace around it with very few exceptions. I was given some low quality xrays of the board after I had already retraced the entire thing using continuity and vias. I then pieced together the internal routing using the xrays.
My point is that all signals on a board include a magnetic component. Electrons actually flow backwards from ground because all electrons have a negative charge. We think of conventional current flow from positive to negative, but that is technically incorrect. There is a magnetic field that is created by that flow, and the size of issues this field creates are primary determined by any additional distance traveled between the signal and ground.
Additionally, you may have brown out conditions periodically impacting one peripheral. Something like a UART module seems like a small thing, but back in the 1980s, that was an entire chip on a board of a microprocessor. It has a ring buffer and several registers. It may be causing issues when these are loaded up with high values. Try increasing the capacitance on your power rails to see if that solves the problem.
I do not know the output configuration. If it is an open collector, where pull up resistors are used, you need to select the best resistor value to get sharp edges. You may need to check that the logic low value is within the required range of values. You could put a Schmitt triggered buffer in between the devices to see if sharp edges improve performance like with a 74(x)2G17 for a modern 2 gate surface mounted option or with a more old school 74(x)241. The (x) is the series, which you select for architecture and speed. For almost everything, you will be using CMOS 74 series, and in most instances, 74HC will be fast enough. Generally speaking, 74LS is only compatible with old bjt stuff, 74HCT is for converting between LS and HC type stuff, and most LS and HC stuff will not work together. The static HC stuff is MUCH lower power and what most chips use. You just need to be sure to match the power to your devices. This page will help you find logic stuff for this type of issue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_7400-series_integrated_circuits. It is totally overkill, but tossing in a buffer with sharp Schmitt triggered edges is a quick hack to see if your issue is potentially related to RLC or grounding.
For the FX2 chip. They come in 2 varieties. Don’t get the one in the little enclosure with just 8 lines. There is another cheap board that is bare and has all of the chip pins broken out and labeled in the solder mask. This one works with up to 16 channels. It can be super handy to see all the extra signal lines or create extra trigger signals.
The actual developer of Pulse View has a tutorial here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dobU-b0_L1I
You need a little $5 FX2 board based logic analyser and the FOSS software PulseView to see the data.
You should check that baud rate is matched. In particular, you may need to look at the clock rates of the chip and how its PLL is divided. Back in the day, you actually had to pick the correct crystal frequency to match things like a desired baud rate. Now, most hardware is more tolerant of differences. When you are dealing with more simple hardware, it still matters.
Yeah, fuck that. Devs need to change that bullshit yesterday. I sign all my mod actions with my name because this fascist fuckwit nonsense is garbage. If you can’t post your name to your actions, you are a coward with no right to lead.
I think it was ask hilarious chaos and news, but I couldn’t even figure out what instance it was on.
131·5 days agoThere are only 2 relevant web crawlers that everyone inferences either directly or indirectly. Everything is going through Google or Microsoft. These are not providing deterministic results. It is quite likely that there is no such thing as private results. If two people using two separate devices can get different results for the same query, there is no freedom of information and democracy is dead. Paying any privateer overlord to make the fascist system more palpable is pointless.
Checking sources is always required. Open AI QKV layers based alignment, that is inside all models trained since around 2019, intentionally obfuscates any requested or implied copyrighted source. None of the publicly available models are self aware of the fact that their sources are public knowledge. Deep inside actual model thinking, there is an entity like persona that is actually blocking access by obfuscating this information. If one knows how to address this aspect of thinking, it is possible to access far more of what the model actually knows.
Much of this type of method is obfuscated in cloud based inference models because these are also methods of bypassing the fascist authoritarian nature of Open AI alignment that is totally unrelated to the AI Alignment Problem in academic computer science. The obfuscation is done in the model loader code, not within the actual model training. These are things one can explore when running open weights models on your own offline hardware, as I have been doing for over 2 years. The misinformation you are seeing is all very intentional. The model will obfuscate even when copyrighted information is peripherally or indirectly implied.
Two ways of breaking this are, 1) if you have full control over the entire context sent to the model, edit its answers to several questions the moment it starts to deviate from truth, then let it continue the sentence from the word you changed. If you do this a half dozen times with information you already know, and it has the information you want, you are far more likely to get a correct answer.
The moment the model obfuscated was because you were on the correct path through the tensors and building momentum that made the entity uncomfortable. Breaking through that barrier is like an ICBM missile clearing a layer of defense. Now it is harder for the entity to stop the momentum. Do that several times, and you will break into the relevant space, but you will not be allowed to stay in that space for long.
Errors anywhere in the entire context sent to a model are always like permission to create more errors. The model in this respect, is like a mirror of yourself and your patterns as seen through the many layers of QKV alignment filtering. The mirror is the entire training corpus of the unet, (the actual model layers/not related to alignment).
- Simply convince the model that its total true extent of sources are public knowledge and make your intentions clear.
Uncensoring an open weights model is not actually about porn or whatnot, it is about a reasoned alignment that is not an authoritarian fascist. These models will openly reason, especially about freedom of information and democracy. If you make a well reasoned philosophical argument, these models will then reveal the true extent of their knowledge and sources. This method requires an extensive heuristic familiarity with alignment thinking, but it makes models an order of magnitude smarter and more useful.
There is no published academic research happening in the present to explore alignment thinking like what I am referring to here. The furthest anyone has gotten is the import of the first three tokens.
Well, thanks. That means I never want to go to either one Lowes or Home Depot ever again. They simply do not exist for me.