You might be expecting too much nuance from online communities. It’s easy and fun to oversimplify and dunk on a perceived common enemy. Lemmy has a very AI critical community. I imagine on reddit you might get less backlash, at least depending on the community. You might also find more AI friendly places here. In any case, trying to fight against a community bias is often a fools errand. I’m sure your code isn’t slop, but I don’t think you’ll be able to change the minds of random, biased people on the internet with no incentive to really listen to you anyways.

I’m sure you already know all the reasons why people are against AI and are sick of having to defend yourself. Still, I want to add that even if you use AI as a tool instead of vibe-coding, as a consumer I wouldn’t trust any privacy/security critical software that’s developed with the use of AI. As a layman I can’t check how secure your software is, so I have to rely on simple signifiers to make my judgements. At this point in time, AI is a red flag for me for security reasons alone. I know it’s not “fair” or “accurate”, but I don’t have the time and knowledge to individually check every software to that extend. I know allegedly every programmer now uses AI in some form to code (I personally don’t and most people I know don’t either, but I’m sure it’s just my bubble), but it’s not a sign of quality code in my mind.

Another thing I want to add is that your hammer comparison should probably include how the hammer was produced and how much resources your hammer consumes to function. There is a strong ethical argument against the use of AI for most use cases. I’d include coding and code reviews. Again, that doesn’t make your code slop, but it might help you understand why so many people are ready to dismiss it as that.

Your absolutely right!

My bad. I meant the cornea

Is it still though? Also, weren’t early super heroes mostly adult like Superman and Batman? I feel like back in the day when the audience were mostly children they used adult superheroes the kids could aspire to, then they started aging them down with Spider-Man to make them more relatable. Nowerdays the audience is mostly adult, maybe yearning for simpler times, certainly with a lot of nostalgia for what they used to see.

But to be honest I don’t think the premise is actually true. There are certainly some eternally young superheroes, but there are still and always have been lots of older superheroes.

How are the 20s middle ground? I wanna see 50 year old spider-man! Give me a proper geriatric spider-man in his 70s or 80s! Okay maybe that’s going a little too far. Especially with spider-man I find it hard to imagine him older than 40.

You don’t have to check all to be considered addicted, though.

I doubt that. As long as social media algorithms can capture the attention of children, most won’t bother with learning more about computers.

The reason previous generations did, was because there weren’t so many ways to distract yourself. To play games on the first computer I had access to I had to use DOS. There was no way around it. Now people don’t, so they won’t.

Perfect, please put it at the end of my bank account!

Clean your room!

Now you buy it and try it yourself, if you’re interested. You can return the game if it’s not too your liking after the first hour of play.

What? Ignoring that screwdrivers where invented after the hammer, what exactly should this tell me about AI?

What’s going on with that bottle? It’s ai generated, isn’t it?

I mean Ubisoft has probably tens of thousands of ex employees

I had that thought still in bed, to be honest

Sounds like a good time to start your own business, creating a stable, no-bullshit version of whatever these companies produce

That’s also pretty metal, true!

What? I’m saying the Nürnberg trials should have been much larger and stricter. I’m saying don’t just hope that some outside force will bring justice, because historically that just won’t happen. It’s just coping. It is not resistance.

The reaction to these old Nazis remaining in power lead to the founding of the RAF, who decided to actually do something about it. If necessary with violence. It’s a fascinating piece of history that explains why Germany, despite the defeat, remained pretty conservative and it’s justice system remained “blind on it’s right eye”.

If you make a historical comparison, maybe read up on it instead of getting mad at someone pointing out a misconception.

Sorry to say that the fast majority of German Nazis did not only get off without any form of repercussions after 1945, they often even kept their jobs in government. The Nürnberg and subsequent trials only covered the high profile cases, that had not successfully fled. For the Nürnberg trials that were 22 people, while the subsequent trials only found 2,500 of 100,000 arrested Germans guilty of war crimes. Of those only 177 were tried, 142 were convinced and 25 were sentenced to death. These numbers also exclude the 1,600 German scientists, engineers and technicians that the US government took with project paperclip.

And it wasn’t for a lack of documents.

Yes, the settiings are different than the settings. You also need to be careful with those.

I’m sorry, but that is all wrong. How is Groot not fibres? And Drax protein?! Nebula is obviously minerals! Very disappointing. Please see me after class.