It might be nice to have a way of giving more context, which is what the message option was good for in rofi. Not knocking it though, I am a happy fuzzel user.
It might be nice to have a way of giving more context, which is what the message option was good for in rofi. Not knocking it though, I am a happy fuzzel user.
The script is there in the post, but I haven’t tried it yet. It would be nice if fuzzel had a message option, like rofi, so that key information could be displayed in the passphrases request; that s is what pinentry-rofi uses.
I should have read the article first – passphrases and pinentry are here
Fuzzel is great. I only wish it had a pinentry option.
I do recommend emacs though. It is not the greatest editor, but it is an amazing experience. It is such an amazing experiment, that has an extensive set of different ways of looking at content and code - it will change how you think about coding.
I can’t say that it is, no.
Org-mode is like md but has tables and more. Emacs will even run computation as a party of interpretation. GitHub accepts it in place of markdown.
Have you tried niri yet? What about river?
Kent developed for like 10 years on his own. He’s just having a hard time learning how to play with others, and deal with large priority cycles. He just needs to know that sometime his changes will get pushed to the next cycle.
I use a poopy nano https://ploopy.co/nano-trackball/
Perhaps not useful, but my linux machine doesn’t sleep unless I disconnect my ploopy trackball first, exhibiting the same symptoms.
I am not sure that businesses like Boeing make risk decisions like that. You would think that they would only take a risk that they know they can win, but many times they take a risk and hope that the dice land their way. This would be lives at risk, with calculations assessed by people with very poor records with such assessments.
Fdroid says that it is bound to jawg.io for tiles. What are the chances that we are giving our data to a company who will take it away from us, or is just using us for free labour?
Zed seems cool, but not much better than other options. I am still kind of thrown off by the immediate GH/CoPilot integration. Am I the an old man left in the caves of feeling that I don’t need the AI help?
I thought that there might be a way to a custom facts (gather_facts) to all machines, and indicate leader/joiner status there, but I can’t get the data to stick.
sounds like the same idea. So you use run_once
on a task?
Let me try to reword it to make it clear.
I have 3 machines in my group. 1 of those will be the “leader”. The others will be “joiners”. The leader could already be initialized, so I need to check all machines to see if there is a leader already. If no Leader exists then any of the machines will do (the first) All of the machines that will join will need some data from the leader, so there will be a role task that will be delegated to the leader (ansible needs to know which host is the leader so as to be able to delegate to it)
This may sound complex but it is a very common pattern for distributed application setup.
idempotency doesn’t play a role in this behaviour - the machines are all unique, but who knows what may have changed between ansible runs.
Is it ostree based? I guess I should RTM
Let me try for a pinentry script over the weekend first, to see how the placeholder looks.