Jerkface (any/all)

My gender is my concern, but you may use any pronoun to refer to me

  • 0 Posts
  • 949 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldwhen you see it...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    AFAB genetalia

    It’s called a vulva. You can say vulva, even if its on a man or person of unknown disposition. I get that some people don’t like to use gender-suggestive words for their own body parts, but it’s a euphemism treadmill and soon you won’t be able to say “AFAB” if you get on it.






  • I have a more developed level of conciseness compared to [a particular dog].

    Can you tell me what that looks like?

    I don’t especially believe that humans are maximally conscious, any more than we were any of the other pinnacles of biological development that we always thought we were. Our main super powers are that we sweat, run, and easily consume starch, and you don’t really need more than that to explain us. If consciousness is indeed a gradient, I think it’s just more hubris to assume we are the “most conscious”.

    But it’s a really hard thing to discuss, let alone quantify. I’d love to know your kind of feeling of what more or less conscious looks like.


  • This is exactly where my thoughts have been leading. Consciousness is a fundamentally INTRA-cellular process, that is augmented by INTER-cellular effects. Neurons are merely specialized to support (among other things) higher consciousness, but every cell participates in some form of it.

    These ideas go a long way to explain things like the somatic effects of trauma, personality aspects being transmitted through organ transplant, the obviously aware and self-interested behavior of micro-organisms, the way mental complexity doesn’t really seem to scale with organism size, and a lot of other things that I have been thinking about that perhaps get a bit more metaphysical.

    I suspect that consciousness is not generated but rather captured and exploited by biological systems.

    I’m writing a game that explores a lot of these concepts.












  • They fucking absolutely do. And even if they didn’t, I’m sorry to tell you, killing animals that don’t want to die is cruel and violent. Doing so for sensory pleasure or wealth is deeply wrong. The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

    Your second point is speculative. It’s something you clearly don’t know, but you’re choosing to believe because it gives cover and distraction to cruelty and violence.