Stats like this one, but not this one specifically.
My gender is my concern, but you may use any pronoun to refer to me
Stats like this one, but not this one specifically.
Once I turned a suspicious faucet I shouldn’t have and got a blast of this in the face.
lol the last word of the comment finally brings it into focus
Off topic, but what’s the source? And is this a physically valid walk cycle, or just an animation? The bit where the three feet are all in line looks pretty sketchy but it’s potentially dynamically stable
yeeeeuuuup. Pretty accurate. Easy choice, but it’s going to suuuuuuuuuck.
Replying because I need to think about how I’m going to vote for this comment and plan to come back later.
He does, and gaming on linux is an excellent resource we are fortunate to have. OTOH, GFY has now borne a grudge over this for months and makes a point of posting about it at every opportunity.
This link does not even generate any ad revenue (unless I cannot figure out how to turn off my ad blocking). It’s so petty.
I dunno what cameras you are using but a standard full frame sensor and an F/4 lens sees way better in low light than the human eye. If I take a raw image off my camera, there is so much more dynamic range than I can see or a monitor can even represent, you can double the brightness at least four times (ie 16x brighter) and parts of the image that looked pure black to the eye become perfectly usable images. There is so so so much more dynamic range than the human eye.
Hard to credit without a source, modern cameras have way more dynamic range than the human eye.
I had a dedicated fan for a couple weeks.
you can write “f-slur”
Jesus, the “plandemic” explanation for why the Internet is dying. The Internet IS clearly dying, but this is stupid. Even if we got rid of all the bots and AI, the Internet would still be dying, because open protocols are not as exploitable as walled gardens. The value of capital in the world overwhelms the value of human labour and human interest, and all our social structures conform to the needs of capital over time.
“Do you have a source?” means, “I already know you are wrong but you won’t believe me unless you find out for yourself.”
I find “LEGOs” very upsetting.
Lego is not an acronym. It does not usually get all-caps in prose, though the all-caps logotype is sometimes imitated in text.
Lego is a proper name, and is also used as a collective noun. It does not get pluralized.
“You can’t play with Lego anymore.”
That’s why gen Z is so smart.
My mind always goes to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGjp_l4i5co
It means “principled”. We already had a word for it.
LibreWolf (for example, among other security-conscious software packages) does it by default to reduce enabling of fingerprinting. The information is misused far more often than it is put to any of the user’s interests.