IMO I think it’s fine as long the submitter understand all their changes. This is easiest done if the submitter writes all the code themselves though.

In this case I would reject this. The submitter doesn’t seem to be qualified to understand the code change, and just let ChatGPT explain the code change for them. ChatGPT is a master in being confidently incorrect.

Linux + IntelliJ

I also use VsCode because I like its text editing better.

Retake the photo, but now make the shot at 2 instead of 3

Being frustrated because nvidia drivers sucks

From the FAQ:

Statcounter is a web analytics service. Our tracking code is installed on more than 1.5 million sites globally. These sites cover various activities and geographic locations. Every month, we record billions of page views to these sites. For each page view, we analyse the browser/operating system/screen resolution used and we establish if the page view is from a mobile device.

So yeah, they’re basing of browser user agents.

Can it be fingerprint spoofers skewing the results? In that case the data is worthless.

Opposing fascism isn’t far left. That’s just being a decent person.

Not the one you asked, but I don’t like XML compared to alternatives like JSON.

The main problem with XML is that it’s an unnecessarily complicated standard. There are often multiple ways to represent the same thing, each with their own gotchas and drawbacks.

JSON on the other hand has a much simpler standard. The entire JSON standard fits easily in one page. It’s also closer to how data is actually represented in memory. There’s often one ideal way to represent whatever you have in memory to a JSON file, and the reverse is also true.

Despite it’s simplicity, JSON covers most cases XML would cover. Often in a more elegant way.

If you like pain, then XML is the right choice for you.

Wishful thinking. XML is going to be around for a very long time.

The problem is that mobile versions of the app is expected, and maybe also a web version. And then it should work on Mac as well. Linux is just a tiny fraction of the market share.

Each platform would require their own team if developed natively. That’s a huge headache to coordinate all features between the teams. Let’s build just one cross platform application which one team can be in charge over.

The form factor looks nice. A small box that fits under the TV.

Probably won’t be cheaper than a PC. Otherwise people are just going to buy it just for cheap compute.

Excessive deduplication is an anti pattern.

The point about removing duplicates is to make the maintaining of the code easier. If it makes it harder, then it’s the wrong abstraction.

The thing about terrorism is the sudden shock that comes with it. Someone is deliberately doing a terrible action. It mentally affects an entire nation.

I didn’t feel well for an entire week after Utoya, and I’m not even Norwegian.

The boss then unveils a second health bar

There’s nothing more permanent than a temporary solution

It’s a massive initiative. Entire staff must be retraining. IT infrastructure has to be replaced.

Worst of all, it will face a lot of resistance from stubborn people with a ”if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” mentality. The public sector has a tendency to be quite slow moving.

Nah. The growth of Linux will barely make a dent on Windows user base. Windows is still huge in enterprise settings.

What do you mean by ”I”? What do you mean by ” don’t”? What do you mean by…

More code = more things that must be maintained = more things that can break. It’s natural that development slows down over time. Doesn’t necessarily mean there’s technical debt.