One by one everyone enters the crush room making everything worse for themselves and everyone else.

And they know it’s their fault. And they know there’s an entire room, almost empty, just after that door. And they know they could be in it if they just acted “smarter” (AKA, non-humanely).

The entire thing is horrible.

Hum… Given an eternity to hold people there, this looks like an incredibly powerful method of torture.

Indexing by zero has a huge positive impact on the correctness of complex operations like joining intervals, that nobody trusts themselves to write anyway and always pack behind a well-verified library.

But I think the reason we have it is because C maps it almost immediately into memory offsets.

A duck!

Hum… Actually, no.

aromantic

I had to read that several times to understand how organic chemistry relates to your post.

It’s really not. But it’s the main cause of a kernel panic if you don’t use nvidia hardware.

var CompareBooleans = new ComparatorFactory().BooleanComparator(new BooleanComparisonByEqualityPolicy());
if (CompareBooleans(a, b) == true) {
     System.Out.PrintLn("Sames!!!");
}

…

But now that I’ve written this, it’s C#, so it’s missing dependency injection.

Hum… Hardware does still fail at random.

So many questions…

Does it use some high-distance sensor fusion, it only prints things smaller than those builtin rails, or it just assumes wheels never lose traction and fails on every print?

How is the adherence of a random household floor? Does it require some kind of wax or it fails on every print?

Again, how is the adherence of a random household floor? Can objects be removed after printing? Because if you expect models to be correct on the first try, you’ll fail on every print.

I’m sure I can fix a “why?” somewhere among the questions, but the “how?” is so interesting it would only waste space.

It’s scheduled to stop receiving them October 14, 2025.

Every word user is clueless.

Word itself is full of clues to use something else.

Yes, the modern world is very scary. But I don’t understand how that applies to the idea of ghosts…

Yes, they made a huge mess out of it and managed to “measure” the complete opposite of reality.

And yeah, it was based on a paper published on a joke journal at Apr. 1st. The first paragraph of the paper postulates people occupy no volume. (It’s a fun paper, differently from that TV episode.)

Oh, it’s been a while that my rm -r * .o taught me about backups.

You seem to have too much time to waste. Here, I’ve just cut your jira ticket deadline by a week. Pray I don’t cut it further.

Yep. The post is only true if the plane is high enough.

Do not do it bellow cruise altitude!

You mean the people commenting on the Linux communities?

Not much “against their wishes” if they keep looking there.

Well, more posix compliant than Linux. But I’m not sure any OS out there today actually complies.

(That’s not a complaint, by the way. It’s not a worthwhile goal.)

Well, it’s not a bad decision on itself.

Just the context that is horrible.