Well, for all Turing complete languages around, you picked that one?

Using Blank Space or Malboge would be the wrong answer too.

Your DSL isn’t embedded on a Turing complete language. That was your mistake.

Both will be gone in 2 months without printing…

I guess outlawing people stealing horses was deemed too radical.

The sequels aren’t.

Non-coding architects has been a well known organizational red-flag for decades.

Non-coding people always lose track of reality, and it’s a disaster to give them decision power over fine-grained technical choices.

Now, I don’t really know how that maps into non-coding software developers, but I’m not optimist.

I’m reserving my judgment until after 2038. But yes, everything looks much better this century.

We have been at around the peak for a while:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-production-by-country?country=~OWID_WRL

In fact, we are post-peak, because each barrel of current oil needs a lot more oil to produce than a decade or more ago. It just doesn’t show in the data.

The peak that will show in the data when the demand peaks. But yeah it’s possible he just caused the oil’s demand to peak. He has been a very effective eco-terrorist.

I have asked several times to myself how deep one must burrow a CNC mill until it can run all night without bothering anyone…

It’s agile if the plan is constantly reviewed with every new information in mind and you can change what you are working in to better implement it.

If you do do Scrum, that’s almost never the case.

Somebody that defends personal freedom.

“Lost at sea” means he gone out for fishing and never returned.

He may be out buying cigarettes for all we know.

If you can hold the mandatory economist’s compulsion to be liberal for long enough to write a coherent argument for that intervention, I’m willing to count it and update my opinion.

They never were.

People repeating them on the internet used to do it ironically. But conspiracies always were actual belief systems and have always brought groups of people together to reinforce each other idiocies.

I’ve never seen an economist argue is favor of non-safety related building codes. Ever.

But then those miles in the GP would be nautical. So 4 1/2.

In the 80s. If you look at what your examples have in common, you’ll notice you’ve heard it in the 80s.

Too bad 80s nostalgia is all the hype nowadays, but at least this seems to be passing in other subcultures. I really hope it passes in software development too.

Oh, man. Can you tell what the second step is? I’d really like to learn that.

Well, they have a choice of pandering to this one large customer for whom they’ll always be the untrusted underdog, or pandering for the larger, more diverse market.

They never managed to become profitable as the untrusted underdog, so the option of keeping doing the same was obvious, I guess.

To what precision are they going to measure it?