Hahahahahahahaha hahahahaha.

That’s one of those easy things for me to overshare. I take half a dozen pills daily to function. If they aren’t, or at least don’t know why I take them, it ain’t gonna work.

The actual like, really disabling thing about me isn’t any of the things I’m treated for. It’s my sleep disorder. I still have to show up to my 9-5. My kid still has arrival and pickup times at school. Banks are only open 9-5.

I’ve found that women with treated or untreated disabilities understand this shit way more than normies. That’s not to say go look for them, but don’t try to fit into an ablist mask, that’s far more harmful

Yeah, see, my girlfriend just right out told me. But we’re both AuADHD. So you know, things happen impulsively and directly.

I asked her on a date, she said yes. We get to the date we have fun, we have a long night out, she goes home and texts me “I like you.”

Yep. Which is a good thing too because I liked her and was a lot nervous about that.

I was told I have to adopt agentic AI or I can’t be promised to stay around for too long.

Meanwhile I’m catching all the slop the other devs submit.

I don’t get it. This is will destroy people already bad at coding in the long run, then people like me who really don’t want to implement an agentic (whatever that is) but find all the flaws in the PR, get burned in the long run.

As if MS would use their own Microslop.

Not to mention that many organizations have been making agreements with anthropic before this all happened. Sure DoD has money, but not nearly the large amount of private sector money.

The collapse of this bubble is going to be enormous though.

If you’re talking in terms of a Turing Machine, it’s deterministic. You made it a precondition.

model: a system of postulates, data, and inferences presented as a mathematical description of an entity or state of affairs

But to really argue against your statement of mathematics (and turning machines) it would hold true if Large Language Models were deterministic. They are not.

No. It literally does it. Like the hardware literally does a mathematical computation. It (and all computers) simulate numbers beyond a certain precision?

That’s not how a model works.

Why?

It’s an LLM.

It can’t be conscious. It’s a model. Of text.

They wouldn’t text. That’s too nice.

They’d call. And call. And call. Until you pick up. And when you do all you hear is “food?”

Nah, we unfortunately have mouths. I imagine they could shut off their telepathic communication, but I can’t shut off my ears when I hear conservatives talk.

Sucks to suck I guess. Of everyone who gets theirs, I hope his is nice and drawn out.

Majority of ML/Software Engineers report zero CEOs listened to them about it.

Yay! I love to see it. I briefly looked into it this summer but then I got distracted and lost track

That’s actually a great point that I did overlook.

Of course. It all makes perfect sense.

You know, this really has me pondering my projects architecture. We have tiers of services.

At the top, we have the UI. Then we have a “consumer” an “orchestra” and a “data” tier.

Data is the tier that exclusively talks to databases. Orchestra talks to the multiple data services. A good chunk of business logic is here. Consumer uses the orchestra and handles UI requests.

All it essentially does is split the monolith into 3 services at minimum. And since it’s on the cloud, there’s a start up cost where we need to spin up 3 machines instead of whatever you can do with microservices. What benefit do I get?

Are you proposing the government drones that we haven’t been seeing are spreading weaponized drone flu, or that they have a slowed production until the spring because they are planning something much bigger?