Yep, as written in the manuscript:
“Stallman’s Sluts and Torvalds’ Thots,
shall all receive some thigh-high socks.”

Ctrl+alt+F1/F2/F3 etc.
It lets you switch to another terminal session, where you can use something like top/htop for a commandline equivalent to task manager.

Also the heuristics can be exploited to create a unique identifier for your browser, so it’s not a flawless solution.

I don’t understand…

Your ISP won’t get any of that data.
Almost every website uses SSL/TLS now, so your ISP will only see what time and how much data was transmitted between you and chatgpt.
It’s enough info for a government agency to figure out who you are if they wanted to, but your ISP won’t have any idea what you’re saying.

Because the format command won’t know what the ‘enter’ argument means ;)

Google don’t need an app if they want to spy on you.

Unless you’ve switched to a rom without google play services, they can essentially do anything they want on your phone without you knowing.

Wtf does your diet have to do with catching airborne diseases anyway?
Did she really think swapping meat for broccoli would magically make her immune to all illness?

It looks cool from a distance, but it really falls apart when you look closer

Sex edition

I personally prefer running wordpad with WINE, as I can’t afford an office subscription.

This one’s even worse. You take a shot if you miss, they take a shot if you hit: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kUMaIr4MEHg

Eb Games and Kmart are both huge in Australia

Like what?
Genuinely interested in knowing what he’s said.

Oops

Oops

This could really do with an explanation for wtf ‘pandas’ is, and why this is relevant.

👍

I’m not going to waste any more time arguing against your assumptions, false claims and flawed reasoning, when it’s clear you have no interest in thinking critically about the matter.

Congrats, you win 👍

Here’s a link to the study I mentioned earlier, which indicates that list experiments are not an accurate way to determine the level of preference falsification.
In it, the real response was often more than double the difference between direct polling and the list experiment results.

You continue to argue against things I’ve never said. Calling you out for saying I’ve said or argued for something which I haven’t is not acting high and mighty.
And yet, here you are doing it again…

I never said all polling is wrong, just polling that didn’t properly account for falsification, which the list method is clearly unable to do.

More of the surveyed Russians said they would prefer to talk with Ukraine over continuing military actions.
That doesn’t mean that’s what the government/Putin also believes, it means the population would generally prefer diplomacy over war.

By your same line of logic, why should anyone support LGBT people in places where it’s illegal if you don’t have any plans to change their country’s laws?
We need timeline estimates otherwise it’s pointless.

It’s a terrible defeatist argument which is not worth humoring.

I’m done talking with you now.
You’re deliberately ignoring and misinterpreting any points that don’t align with your view, and its tiring.

All that said, this has been an interesting bit of insight into the mind of a bigot.