I’m not OP but I think it means “Providers are saying consumers should accept subscription-based models without complaint”
I asked a dealer for a dumb-car. No fucking auto 911 dialing, bluetooth enabled, GPS service horseshit, just a normal car and he shot me
Later there’s this text:
which can be found by clicking on the cog at the top right next to the search icon
…which I don’t see. I don’t think this doc accounts for Photon.
Who controls it? Can I suggest edits to these docs?
Nobody asked but I had to share this
It’s important to me that everyone understands the joke, even if that understanding robs them of the joy of it. “Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. It kills it”.
But it’s important because I suffered a lot of being left out as a kid. Others found how good it felt to be exclusive, and shoulder me out of things, or refuse to explain things, or whatever it was that made me the outcast. I could tell from their faces that they love the way it felt when they did that to me. But it hurt me a lot.
I don’t want there to be any exclusivity anymore. Nobody deserves that pain. I want everyone to understand the joke, even if that prevents them from ever laughing at it.
The thought experiment suggests that over a long enough period of time, every possible combination of letters would be typed out on a keyboard, including Hamlet.
They are not arguing about randomness, as it is inherent to the thought experiment. Randomness is necessary for the experiment to occur.
They are arguing that the universe would be dead before the time criteria is met. It is a bitter and sarcastic conclusion to the thought experiment, and is supposed to be funny.
In conversation, it would be delivered like this:
“You know, over a long enough period of time, monkeys smashing typewriters randomly would eventually produce Hamlet”
“The universe isn’t going to last that long.”
Two people are fighting and one gets control of the other. He then throws the person across the room instead of killing him.
that thing looks like a pip boy. i don’t want to carry any of the others you tested into battle
this is interesting as fuck
“I’m really interested in algorithmic enforcement …” Ada Ada Ada told me in an interview. “It seemed like the nipple rule is one of the simplest ways … because it’s set up as a very binary idea—female nipples no, male nipples, yes. But then it prompts a lot of questions: what is male nipple? What is a female nipple?”
She’s using her own journey as a trans person to document how AI tools like those used by Instagram identify potentially obscene material.
That’s like saying I don’t need to clean my room if I can just shove everything into the closet
This feels like a very lazy emotional response.
You’re saying that under no conditions whatsoever you would start shouting at people in public? That you would get violent to defend something that was important to you? Please don’t be an idiot.
You don’t need to be the winner of violent conflict to be valid.
Thank you for pointing this out!
I hoped for a second they meant moneyless.
Do you have any more info about this?
buddy christ wasn’t fucking adorable though? I didn’t want to pre-order buddy christ???
She left the lens cap on
What’s a challenge you solved that you were really proud of?
my mate helped me masturbate yesterday does that make us gay
Does this also get rid of annoying pop-ups?